Would you mind telling us why you emphasized that this was a lesbian couple, moreso than the actual article did?Mr.Awesome said:Yes, I am American so unfortunately a good bit of news does come from places like Fox news and MSNBC. I don't see how it's misleading though. The headline is indeed what is happening, and then posted the whole article for everyone to read, purposefully not offering any of my own commentary.
Trojita said:That is very odd if true. At 3 years old the concept of gender is still forming.
It would usually be that if they were signing they would say Tommy was a boy and point to themselves to say their girls. The concept wouldn't mean much at that time to the child except knowing that word as an identifier for themselves.
2th said:Kid will regret it come high school where he/she/it gets tormented mercilessly. Which will possibly result in suicide which will possibly result in lawsuits for bullying. Yeah... how did anyone think this was a good idea?
if true, yes.Esperado said:Child abuse.
Trojita said:That is very odd if true. At 3 years old the concept of gender is still forming.
It would usually be that if they were signing they would say Tommy was a boy and point to themselves to say their girls. The concept wouldn't mean much at that time to the child except knowing that word as an identifier for themselves.
Stet said:Hormone blockers don't make him any less of a male, people, jesus. They delay the onset of puberty so he has more time to decide the road he's on so he doesn't end up killing himself like a lot of other transexuals have.
DeaconKnowledge said:He's a male.
They are indirectly influencing him towards sex change therapy.
Kurdel said:Must.... Resist... Avatar quote...
Also, people are reeeaaallllyyyy ignorant in this thread. Go read up and come back when you grasp, what is at hand here.
GhaleonEB said:Setting gay adoption back years in the process.
2th said:Kid will regret it come high school where he/she/it gets tormented mercilessly. Which will possibly result in suicide which will possibly result in lawsuits for bullying. Yeah... how did anyone think this was a good idea?
To illustrate the sex difference (i.e. lesbian couple infers 2 women and boy, well, infers boy).FoneBone said:Would you mind telling us why you emphasized that this was a lesbian couple, moreso than the actual article did?
GhaleonEB said:Setting gay adoption back years in the process.
Idiots, and terrible parents, to boot.
Utako said:Now he will be androgynous no matter how he chooses.
That's a problem.
I'm not following you at all.Mr.Awesome said:To illustrate the sex difference (i.e. lesbian couple infers 2 women and boy, well, infers boy).
Did you read the entirety of the OP before making this post?jeremyxc said:People drastically effect others at such a young age..
This isn't helping the gay marriage argument either,
make responsible choices people..
send them straight to jail
Utako said:Now he will be androgynous no matter how he chooses.
That's a problem.
I don't think the child can make an informed decision until they've gone through puberty. That's a very confusing time for everyone, and not allowing the process to take place naturally is more likely to cause a misinformed decision than letting it occur, I would think.Sol.. said:i'm confused. some of the comments aren't matching what i'm reading. Because it sounds like they are doing whatever they can to make sure this kid has to chance to make a informed decision.
I did actually know a person in high-school who felt so androgynous that they asked their close friends to use gender-neutral pronouns when referring to them. Just saying in response to the scorn some people are giving the he/she/it comment.Kurdel said:Your view of the world is really astonishing.
Not only you don't understand the situation at hand, but are generous enough to think of the poor "he/she/it"s feelings? They should of asked your advice rather than the myriad of medical profesionals!
Read the article, they are taking the time to not make a mistake.
Ferrio said:This thread's responses depress me. Not surprising though. We can't even have a virtual transgender person (Poison) without people losing their shit.
I doubt the baby is really thinking about the color of the blanket right after it was born. We assign a gender identifier, but a baby could care less.Gaborn said:I disagree with this COMPLETELY. From birth boys are put in blue blankets and girls in pink blankets. Baby girls are given more girly toys and baby boys are given more boyish toys.
Aside from that though there is ample evidence that gender is deeply ingrained, as the tragic tale of David Reimer attests. Though in his case an accident during circumcision destroyed his penis and he was sexually reassigned by his parents to be raised as a girl. Problem being he WASN'T a girl and knew it early on and was constantly acting out against it.
Think of this as the exact same situation only the SRS hasn't been performed yet. David Reimer's mind KNEW he was a boy, just like Tammy's mind apparently KNOWS she is a girl.
What. The. Fuck.
Charoncaori said:I think this is the first pro-Fox News thread I've seen on this entire site.
In all fairness most people who are agreeing with it didn't seem to actually read the article.Charoncaori said:I think this is the first pro-Fox News thread I've seen on this entire site.
Based on your outrage, I'm assuming you're just reading the title of the thread and not the contents of it?Pachterballs said:HOW IS THIS NOT A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.
WTF AM I READING!?
To be fair, the subject matter is pretty damn confusing. I had no idea this stuff was so involved before I made friends with a group of people that included a transgender person and had a few heated discussions.Gaborn said:I think GAF just doesn't understand what is going on. The fact of the sensationalized article rife with scare quotes doesn't help either, but much of this is simply ignorance about transgender people.
Gaborn said:Can you explain in what way this is true?
jeremyxc said:send them straight to jail
Ah okay. Makes more sense now. Thanks for the link.Gaborn said:Read this thread from 2008. If they are serious about it it's best to begin early. And delaying puberty can help make the decision in a less pressure packed environment.
Kurdel said:Your view of the world is really astonishing.
Not only you don't understand the situation at hand, but are generous enough to think of the poor "he/she/it"s feelings? They should of asked your advice rather than the myriad of medical profesionals!
Read the article, they are taking the time to not make a mistake.
Medical practitioners have to be careful with children with gender identity issues, said Dr. Kenneth Zucker, head of the Gender Identity Service in the Child, Youth, and Family Program and professor at the University of Toronto. Giving children hormone blockers to kids before the age of 13 is too early, he said.
Zucker conducted a study following 109 boys who had gender identity disorder between the ages of 3 and 12. Researchers followed up at the mean age of 20 and found 12% of these boys continued to want to change genders.
"The vast majority of children lose their desire to be of the other gender later," he said. "So what that means is that one should be very cautious in assuming say that a 6-year-old who has strong desire to be of the other gender will feel that way 10 years later."
.Aeana said:Hey you guys.
Read the story.
Acerac said:In all fairness most people who are agreeing with it didn't seem to actually read the article.
Based on your outrage, I'm assuming you're just reading the title of the thread and not the contents of it?
The_Technomancer said:I did actually know a person in high-school who felt so androgynous that they asked their close friends to use gender-neutral pronouns when referring to them. Just saying in response to the scorn some people are giving the he/she/it comment.