Can you provide scientific proof that is doesnt
The burden of the proof is on the one that acuses.
Seems strange that they settled on the exact same pro settings and the option they had for the pro version of the original game. It’s like the engine is already set up to do 1800p cbr and they just went with it. Not good
BS unless proven otherwise. Sorry, I’m not going to trust hyperbolic PC gamers.
Yeah I’m calling BS on you because the 30fps mode in this is unbearable and makes me dizzy
Wow, what an impressive effort, you are certainly not lazy (like me). Thanks to this we have a rough idea that native 1440P can possibly be as fast maybe even faster than 1800pCB. The cost of HFW specific implementation can differ of course, but i don't think it should be 'that' different. Well done.Let's do some weird math with that pic
1080p native = 1920x1080 = 2073600 px
1440p native = 2560x1440 = 3686400 px
1800p native = 3200x1800 = 5760000 px
1440p looks to have 64% of the 1800p px... if we take that with the 12.2ms from 1800p then you will have 7.8ms for 1440p.
1440p looks to have 178% of the 1080p px... if we take that with the 5.2ms from 1080p then you will have 9.2ms for 1440p.
I can't say for sure where 1440p native will land but it is most probably between 7.8ms and 9.2ms.
So for this game even in the worst scenario the 1440p native will be faster than 1800p CBR (9.2ms vs 9.6ms).
But that only accounting for this test render time (I don't know what is he rendering in the test but it probably not a full frame maybe an effect because in 30fps the each frame can be up to 33.3ms... so 9.6ms seems to be some part of the render only)... anyway the point is that there are others things not showed in this test like bandwidth use, CPU user, etc... he choose a part of the render to show his gains in that part... maybe a full frame render should be a better comparison because it englobes everything.
Maybe 1440p native can indeed works.
It just that I don't believe they didn't test 1440p native at all... resolution is not chose like that... they tests several scenarios to decide which one to optmize and use.
I don’t believe you, sorry.
In movie it does not have rapid camera movement that simulate how real life works, try to search the term motion sickness to get a better idea of the term.
Do u think they'll overhaul it?
Well, they did use CBR for the first game, and they worked on the CBR used in Death Stranding, AND Sony has built in hardware in the PS4 for CBR. It's also the exact same method used in this game on the PS4 Pro.
So you just think the YEARS of people talking about this are all just made up? I supposed you think people who get sick from too narrow an FOV or head bob are making it up too, right?
Yeah have a lg c1 the ghosting and over sharppened is out of control and Guerilla needs to fix it
Yes. How about that scientific evidence? Is there any research?
Exactly what I've been thinking. I also think the problem has to do with the TV. I started playing the ps4 version on my small monitor, when I changed to the ps5 version on my 4k QLED the grass shimmer appeared only on the resolution mode. Now I changed back to my small monitor, the shimmering disappeared and other stuff started happening. For example when light shines through surfaces it appears as a white blur when the camera stops moving.
Yeah but no, 30fps is shite
Sorry bud, Df doesn’t think that and I trust them.
There is no difference in framerate between videos or games… in fact when you watch somebody in YouTube playing is basically watching a movie.
And all these 30fps sickers are here in GAF…
A whole videogame industry history is not enough?
Playing something and watching something are 2 different things
That's just the usual downside of checkerboard rendering. Motion artifacts
Yeah even on PS4 Pro. The PS5 version is crazy.This game is texture monster, best looking textures aside some PC games with mods:
Well I called that a week ago and people said I was overreacting.
Shame it all falls apart in motion everything looks like it spent the night getting lap dances from strippers covered in glitter
Nice straw man. Don't think anyone's comparing 30 fps to cancer. It's comparing it to 60 where it 'hurts the eyes'. Your probably just not sensitive to it. Doesn't mean it isn't a real thing. Its is harder to take in visually that's a fact. Add in motion blur, frame spikes, and how most people are playing FW after just playing their recent 60 fps game. It's not that crazy a concept.
It's lower res than the first. The first game had better iq. I believe the first was 1800p checkerboarded to 2160p where this is checkerboarded to 1800p.Seems strange that they settled on the exact same pro settings and the option they had for the pro version of the original game. It’s like the engine is already set up to do 1800p cbr and they just went with it. Not good
I think there's def some uncanny valley people are experiencing.
Both these have the same meaning. Checkerboarded 1800p just means 3200x1800 but with half resolution on the horizontal axis (so, 1600x1800) which gets reconstructed to a final 3200x1800 output. This output is always upscaled to 4k regardless of what the input resolution was.
Thare are Dozens of you!!
Gaf does this stuff all the time. I remember when Killzone shadow fall first came out this place was filthy with up close photos of tree bark and metal grating. Saw it talked and hyped about so much that I thought when I finally get a PS4 I'm going to get this Killzone game. Such a shitty game.This game is texture monster, best looking textures aside some PC games with mods:
You, sir, I like you.
These people have been watching movies and television at 24/29/30fps their whole lives. Movies, specially action movies, are filled with camera pans and that always causes motion blur. These people don’t feel sick with this, but they do with games? Nah, I’m calling it fake outrage, hyperbole and BS.
Well this game is a texture monster. They are everywhere, hi res detailed textures are on everything. The short, green grass that I walk through I see every individual blade.
