adamsapple
Banned
I mean .. that's weird.
Cash only or not, you'd assume there would be at least ONE person with concerns/questions about a 70 Billion dollar sale.
I'd have had at least a few questions if I was on that investor call.
Long term growth is the most important aspect, like Xbox Game Pass subscription services that constantly brings in revenue.Lol...ok bud. I'm well aware of where MS is going...i'm simply stating from a 'gamer' perspective that their halo/forza quote is disingenuous. Relax.
If I was a MS stockholder I wouldnt care either. MS just made $18.8 billion profit in one quarter. At this rate, thy could fully pay for Activision in about 2.5 more quarter earnings. Given how MS earnings are always going up too, that $70B price tag will be fully paid for before end of the year.
Yet Gaf armchair analysts demand precise figures on anything related to the Xbox division.
Yet it still managed to chart at #2 on Dec NPD.Reminder: 18M and 20M of users, not sales (Halo Infinite is a F2P btw)
You're not teaching me anything. Seriously. I'm well aware of MS's sub model...its existed before GP.Long term growth is the most important aspect, like Xbox Game Pass subscription services that constantly brings in revenue.
It has?Their market cap after hours has dropped more than 70B
-5% so far. Over 100B wiped out
It has?
292.14 +3.65 (+1.27%)
After hours: 7:18PM EST
They wasted a ton of money in gaming. investors still want them out of gaming, the division has done nothing but force them to spend spend spend.It has?
292.14 +3.65 (+1.27%)
After hours: 7:18PM EST
More like it did...then they had their conference call and guidance calmed the seasIt has?
292.14 +3.65 (+1.27%)
After hours: 7:18PM EST
LmaoThey wasted a ton of money in gaming. investors still want them out of gaming, the division has done nothing but force them to spend spend spend.
They wasted a ton of money in gaming. investors still want them out of gaming, the division has done nothing but force them to spend spend spend.
but how about their gaming division in general cause they cant keep losing money and with 25 million i expected alot more suscribers with in the years.![]()
Well that pretty much kills that "ms has to recoup that 70b asap" narrative.
Growth but no profit, it's all fine with me but there are investors that just sees gaming as a black hole for their money at ms.This is a really poor post in a quarter where both their Gaming and Xbox divisions show growth.
I mean .. come on.
Do you know how much money makes GamePass? Did they mentioned it?BUt hOw aRRe tHeY makIng MoNeY witH GamPass!?
Sales of a single month on the physical sales (which are less than half of the total) of a country that has less than a third of the total sales of the world.Yet it still managed to chart at #2 on Dec NPD.![]()
Or in other words:Them markets are crazy right now
Good to see that you agree now.That doesn't have to do with their results in particular though.
If they feel that strongly about it, they can pull thier investments put at any time and put it in one of the other billion companies out there.Growth but no profit, it's all fine with me but there are investors that just sees gaming as a black hole for their money at ms.
You live 7 years ago right?Growth but no profit, it's all fine with me but there are investors that just sees gaming as a black hole for their money at ms.
Do you know how much money makes GamePass? Did they mentioned it?
In before negative spin.
It doesnt. actually.Well that pretty much kills that "ms has to recoup that 70b asap" narrative.
There's some fear over their cloud stuff that's the cause of a lot of that and it just resonated today. MS charges too much for many of their Azure services, particularly in the data space, and they're being undercut in a few key areas by companies like Snowflake and Sigma. I'm moving some data warehouse stuff to Snowflake and it's going to save $200k per year. And I'm not even using that much Synapse.They are but the drop today seemed extremely unnecessary imo.
Yes, they did grow recently because in hardware they released a console and in software now they added the Zenimax revenue there. In a couple of years its software part will grow more because they'll ad Activision Bizzard.I don't think anyone will say how much, but it earned more revenue year over year, so it's safe to say it's working out decently.
Ya that’s hilarious lolHAHHAHAHAAH I LOVE THIS DUDE!
I mean .. that's weird.
Cash only or not, you'd assume there would be at least ONE person with concerns/questions about a 70 Billion dollar sale.
I'd have had at least a few questions if I was on that investor call.
Yes, they did grow recently because in hardware they released a console and in software now they added the Zenimax revenue there. In a couple of years its software part will grow more because they'll ad Activision Bizzard.
Nothing of that info is related to Gamepass.
Yes, we knew that GP is now 25M and that Zenimax is now first party. So yes, obviously it increased. But how much revenue does make Gamepass?- Game Pass + First Party title sales up YoY
It's in the very tweet I posted.
Yes, they did grow recently because in hardware they released a console and in software now they added the Zenimax revenue there. In a couple of years it will grow more because they'll ad Activision Bizzard.
Who cares we are talking cash on hand dude.Their market cap after hours has dropped more than 70B
-5% so far. Over 100B wiped out
Yes, we knew that GP is now 25M and that Zenimax is now first party. So yes, obviously it increased. But how much revenue does make Gamepass?
That $70B in cash sitting on the balance sheet doesn't generate much value for shareholders. Investing it in the purchase of a company with a solid revenue stream that can immediately add earnings to the bottom line is exactly what they want management to be doing. There aren't many downsides to the acquisition. Hopefully Phil can manage those studios well.I mean .. that's weird.
Cash only or not, you'd assume there would be at least ONE person with concerns/questions about a 70 Billion dollar sale.
I'd have had at least a few questions if I was on that investor call.
Weird how they never say.For the company, yes, quite a bit.
They never say for the gaming division though.
Sony reveals the revenue of 'network services' (Plus + Gold revenue) for their gaming division. GP+Gold revenue combined would be nice to compare them.I don't think any company reveals numbers in this level of minutiae.
Hell, MS doesn't reveal console hardware sell through numbers either.
Now with ABK (if they continue releasing their games for PS), MS gaming division will be making almost the same revenue than Sony gaming division.They have Zenimax revenue, but also running costs, plus returns on a sunken cost $7b investment. Still deep in the heavy subsidy phase. Which makes me wonder how much deeper they are willing to dig offsetting the acquisition cost of ABK in terms of rejigging the pipeline.
Starfield is going to be an interesting test case because whether it underperforms or overperforms in terms of uplift to services is going to impact their planning going forwards.
MS's story about gaming is engagement; you put 1st party games day one on a sub service that has 25 million folks your sales are going to take a huge hit.
Halo Infinite still charted though.
Can’t wait to see what they do next.
![]()
Well that pretty much kills that "ms has to recoup that 70b asap" narrative.