• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT6| Made this thread during Harvey because the ratings would be higher

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blader

Member
So you're saying that Trump did something illegal, immoral, against policy? That's the boom?

Just throw it on the list of other illegal, immoral, against policy things he has done (some much worse than this).
This is just another day that ends in "y" in Trump's America. For anyone else it would be a huge deal. With Trump... oh well.

I mean if your expectation is that Trump should be in handcuffs by the end of the day, then yes, every development in this story is going to disappoint you.
 
...

Mark Belling‏ @MarkBellingShow 20m20 minutes ago
More
EXCLUSIVE: Sheriff Clarke is Resigning This Afternoon. Mark has details right now on AM-1130 WISN and on the iHeart app @Markbellingshow

Getting ready for that DHS secretary job.....
Confirmation hearing would be hilariously bad
 

studyguy

Member
clarke__10.jpg

How long has this dude not had his beard?
#falseflag, some random guy is clearly standing in for Clarke
#whereisthebeard #notclarke
 

Teggy

Member
The Associated Press @AP
BRAKING: Trump administration announces sharp cuts in programs promoting 2018 health care enrollment under Affordable Care Act.
4:31 PM · Aug 31, 2017

Welp
 

studyguy

Member
Axios (@axios)
BREAKING: HHS announces it's cutting the advertising budget for ACA by 90% https://t.co/TYKlQKRkFH

Alice Ollstein (@AliceOllstein)
They are also cutting funding for navigators (who help people sign up for health insurance) by 41% https://t.co/xVd9oBoSEk

"Sharp" is an understatement.
It might as well not exist for ad budget to ACA any longer.
 

Kusagari

Member
Has our favorite Southern Belle said anything yet?

Graham was saying ending DACA would be disastrous earlier this month.
 
I think you'd have more than enough votes for this. Good shit.

If that's true, would it survive a veto?
The immigration bill passed by a vetoproof in the Senate in 2013, although Democrats have lost ground since then. We'll see.

IIRC DACA didn't grant citizenship did it? Just allowed people to stay. You could probably win over some Republicans on that merit since it wouldn't be full amnesty.
 
If that's true, would it survive a veto?
perhaps not, but then Trump would have to own ending it. Right now the admin position is that the DACA program is illegal w/o legislation supporting it... he can't say he was just following the law if he vetos a bill.

IIRC DACA didn't grant citizenship did it? Just allowed people to stay. You could probably win over some Republicans on that merit since it wouldn't be full amnesty.
Yeah, it just gave them a work permit and let them stay without deportation.
 
Hmm, I'm not sure how to take this. Like with any technical subject matter, the media could very well be blowing things out of proportion. I imagine the excerpt is probably from an introductory section outlining or establishing the overarching legal framework for analysis. Obviously the real meat is in the details which they don't really provide:

The obstruction-related memo advanced other arguments beyond the matter of the president's executive powers, citing case law that the lawyers believed buttressed the contention that Mr. Trump had not obstructed justice.

Touting a legal memo without describing the case law they used is like looking at a doctor's note without reference to symptoms. Of course they're going to state a general conclusion/prognosis, the relevant question is how they are supporting that conclusion. Are they arguing that the authority should be absolute and have no restrictions whatsoever (I highly doubt it)? Or are they arguing that it's a threshold question and that Trump didn't cross it based on reference to other cases?

Very hard to read into this without more information. That said, the fact they wrote the memo at all basically confirms that obstruction is on the table.
 
This reminds me of the woman in the Vox story who is a navigator and voted for Trump anyways.
Oh Christ that woman.

"What do you think when Trump says he wants to repeal Obamacare"
"He doesn't mean that"

Everyone tied themselves into pretzel knots to give Trump the absolute benefit of the doubt even when it was crystal clear that 1) he has no idea what he was talking about, 2) he has no intention of following through on any of his inane promises, and 3) he is a reprehensible human being.

People claim the poor, stupid white working class was simply hoodwinked by Trump, but not all delusion comes out of ignorance. Clinton's view of the world was 100% true and it wasn't nice - yes, those coal jobs are lost forever. There probably isn't going to be the political will to enact a totally new healthcare system, so it's better to fix our current one. You need to pay your fucking taxes and eat your vegetables.

Trump by contrast promised that everyone would have better healthcare, better jobs, and a fucking unicorn in every garage. I don't think anyone seriously believed he could do it - but they wanted to.
 

Kevinroc

Member
Axios (@axios)
BREAKING: HHS announces it's cutting the advertising budget for ACA by 90% https://t.co/TYKlQKRkFH

Alice Ollstein (@AliceOllstein)
They are also cutting funding for navigators (who help people sign up for health insurance) by 41% https://t.co/xVd9oBoSEk

"Sharp" is an understatement.
It might as well not exist for ad budget to ACA any longer.

Just another reminder that the fight over the ACA still isn't over.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
Greg Abbott just said he was proud, prideful and pridey proud of President Trump and a lady who had a baby even though there was litter on her lawn.
 

Piecake

Member
William Bradford, a controversial Trump appointee who sent racist and anti-Semitic tweets before being chosen to lead the Energy Department’s Office of Indian Energy, resigned from his position on Thursday.

“Bradford tendered his resignation this afternoon and is no longer with the Department of Energy, ” Shaylyn Hynes, an Energy Department spokesperson, said by email.

Before he joined the administration, Bradford had referred to Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief executive, as a “little arrogant self-hating Jew” and had called President Obama “Kenyan creampuff” on Twitter.

And on the anniversary in 2016 of the opening of internment camps to detain Japanese-Americans during World War II, he said: “It was necessary.”

Controversy has followed Bradford long before his appointment in the Energy Department. In 2015, he resigned from another job with the federal government — as an assistant law professor at West Point — after it was discovered he wrote an academic paper in which he called for legal scholars “sympathetic to Islamist aims” to be imprisoned or “attacked.” He also suggested journalists who talk to those scholars could also be targeted.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...raging-tweets-resigns/?utm_term=.da387ddee84e

The best people
 

tbm24

Member
Axios (@axios)
BREAKING: HHS announces it's cutting the advertising budget for ACA by 90% https://t.co/TYKlQKRkFH

Alice Ollstein (@AliceOllstein)
They are also cutting funding for navigators (who help people sign up for health insurance) by 41% https://t.co/xVd9oBoSEk

"Sharp" is an understatement.
It might as well not exist for ad budget to ACA any longer.
Love their plan of publically sabotaging the ACA to then turn around and say SEE ITS FAILING JUST LIKE WE SAID ALL ALONG!
 

Jeels

Member
Axios (@axios)
BREAKING: HHS announces it's cutting the advertising budget for ACA by 90% https://t.co/TYKlQKRkFH

Alice Ollstein (@AliceOllstein)
They are also cutting funding for navigators (who help people sign up for health insurance) by 41% https://t.co/xVd9oBoSEk

"Sharp" is an understatement.
It might as well not exist for ad budget to ACA any longer.

This man is so fucking petty. The government literally not able to do its job to help people.
 
This man is so fucking petty. The government literally not able to do its job to help people.

He may be petty but he lacks foresight. This sets him up to take the blame when enrollments inevitably decline and premiums spike. Also probably not a good idea to do this when it inevitably becomes a point of contention in budget/debt ceiling negotiations - both of which need to be wrapped up within a month.
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
Love their plan of publically sabotaging the ACA to then turn around and say SEE ITS FAILING JUST LIKE WE SAID ALL ALONG!
I mean, they did the same thing with government "it's not the answer it's the problem" then sabotaged it themselves through obstruction or malfeasance and people still tag along on that. Why should healthcare be different?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom