And you're a manic depressive who tries to make up for his own insecurities by equalising others. You think you're being a Good Person™ but you're just making the same mistakes that all the other overly-empathetic equalisers always make.
I argue points just fine when I want to.
You've even complimented me on it. I just try to be judicious with such input because it requires a lot of effort and there's a time and a place for it. Quite often that effort is wasted if it's expended on the wrong person, so I try to gauge who I'm responding to first. A lot of the time, I suppose because it's the nature of the internet, I deduce that the person isn't being honest and in that case it's easier/more fun/more effective to lob a sarcastic insult their way and let them know that I'm not playing their game. Imagine if I went to such effort for NI, dragonfart or OptimusAnus. Waste of time.
You clearly are the kind of person who believes that social hierarchies are inherently bad, so you try your damnedest to eradicate them. Because you fight against social hierarchies, you fall into the trap of trying to find power differentials and adjudicate based on that. This results in you ignoring the actions of your perceived weaker party and focusing only on the actions of your perceived stronger party. We've done this dance enough times for me to understand that about you. This is why you fail to see the utility in insults. You can't comprehend that they're a means of knocking someone back down the social hierarchy until they can engage honestly. You also can't differentiate between insults either -- you simply perceive an insult and ignore everything that preceded it. They're all equivalent to you. This is smoothbrain behaviour. Some insults are deserved while others are ad hominem and should be discouraged by the group.
If you want to graduate back up to Big Brain Miku, you need to wrap your head around the fact that social hierarchies are natural and are only bad when they become corrupted. People are different and attempting to equalise them does more harm than good in the long run. Some are smarter than others. Some are funnier than others. Some are more compassionate than others. In my estimation, these are the main factors that determine internet social hierarchies where physical attributes are a non-factor. Insults are not necessarily a sign of a corrupted social hierarchy and you need to get this idea out of your head. The hierarchy is only corrupted when there are double standards and protected posters. I get as much as I give, so there's no double standard in my view.
You seem to always think you've caught me in a "gotcha" moment when you cry about my use of insults as rhetorical devices but I'm pretty open about what I'm doing. You just can't/don't want to understand it.