blackadde said:9-ish on a dual-layer (4.7 per layer) I believe.
True, but I'm thinking about usable space.
Che, good job at invoking Xbox 1.5 in the round table chat.
blackadde said:9-ish on a dual-layer (4.7 per layer) I believe.
blackadde said:9-ish on a dual-layer (4.7 per layer) I believe.
blackadde said:9-ish on a dual-layer (4.7 per layer) I believe.
Amir0x said:You know, as much as I dislike the options Microsoft are offering us at launch, I still think all this jumping ship, "PS3 or bust", etc... proclamations is so ridiculously premature. I can't wait for the PS3 price thread, when people are like "399.99 w/o HD. WTF was Sony thinking? Page 1 2 3 4 5...98" and "Sony and Microsoft have officially gone mad. Does Nintendo has a chance again? Page 1 2 3 4 5...32" Nintendo left off HD and ethernet port, and that was just a taste of the bitching.
We've gotta see how consumers react, how developers react, and how the games look at least a few fucking months after the thing launches. You know we're all gonna buy something next-gen eventually, and we're all gonna have shit to bitch about in all camps. I think some of us have to get use to that prospect![]()
Amir0x said:I can't wait for the PS3 price thread, when people are like "399.99 w/o HD. WTF was Sony thinking? Page 1 2 3 4 5...98
Amir0x said:You know, as much as I dislike the options Microsoft are offering us at launch, I still think all this jumping ship, "PS3 or bust", etc... proclamations is so ridiculously premature. I can't wait for the PS3 price thread, when people are like "399.99 w/o HD. WTF was Sony thinking? Page 1 2 3 4 5...98" and "Sony and Microsoft have officially gone mad. Does Nintendo has a chance again? Page 1 2 3 4 5...32" Nintendo left off HD and ethernet port, and that was just a taste of the bitching.
We've gotta see how consumers react, how developers react, and how the games look at least a few fucking months after the thing launches. You know we're all gonna buy something next-gen eventually, and we're all gonna have shit to bitch about in all camps. I think some of us have to get use to that prospect![]()
that's assuming it's higher than $299 ...Amir0x said:You know, as much as I dislike the options Microsoft are offering us at launch, I still think all this jumping ship, "PS3 or bust", etc... proclamations is so ridiculously premature. I can't wait for the PS3 price thread, when people are like "399.99 w/o HD. WTF was Sony thinking? Page 1 2 3 4 5...98" and "Sony and Microsoft have officially gone mad. Does Nintendo has a chance again? Page 1 2 3 4 5...32" Nintendo left off HD and ethernet port, and that was just a taste of the bitching.
We've gotta see how consumers react, how developers react, and how the games look at least a few fucking months after the thing launches. You know we're all gonna buy something next-gen eventually, and we're all gonna have shit to bitch about in all camps. I think some of us have to get use to that prospect![]()
AniHawk said:Man, early adopters will get so screwed by this. I think MS's strategy will be to lower the price of everything when the PS3 hits, meaning the prices of controllers (or maybe including a wireless superpack for $50 including the two other things for it), the $399 system, maybe memory cards, and probably faceplates. That way, in the face of the PS3, everything that was once so expensive now has a higher perceived value. Sort of a Platinum Hits thinking on hardware on their part.
Amir0x said:You know, as much as I dislike the options Microsoft are offering us at launch, I still think all this jumping ship, "PS3 or bust", etc... proclamations is so ridiculously premature. I can't wait for the PS3 price thread, when people are like "399.99 w/o HD. WTF was Sony thinking? Page 1 2 3 4 5...98" and "Sony and Microsoft have officially gone mad. Does Nintendo has a chance again? Page 1 2 3 4 5...32" Nintendo left off HD and ethernet port, and that was just a taste of the bitching.
We've gotta see how consumers react, how developers react, and how the games look at least a few fucking months after the thing launches. You know we're all gonna buy something next-gen eventually, and we're all gonna have shit to bitch about in all camps. I think some of us have to get use to that prospect![]()
Mrbob said:Don't see it happening. Only the hardest of the hardcore Xbots and those who can't afford a next gen system will be the ones complaining. People are bracing for a above 300 dollar price point. Now seeing what MS is offering Sony offering the base package (I think there will be only one anyways) at $349 or $399 is acceptable for the one true next generation system coming out. The PLAYSTATION 3 offers so much more tech for the money at 399 than the core pack does for X360 at 299.
Now, if the PS3 somehow goes over 399, let the flaming commence.Of course, Sony has done a nice job so far getting people ready for next gen. They haven't had a 5 month clusterfuck and continuing like MS has accomplished.
gofreak said:I'm not sure how much complaining you'd see here with a $399 PS3.
MS has managed to make such a prospect excellent value for money relatively speaking. And you know, that's reasonably hard to do. Sony probably can't believe their luck right now.
Musashi Wins! said:oh to be sure. the ps3 will probably be overpriced, get features cut, have crap launch games, etc. and that will be cause for the usual crew to guess nintendo is having a resurgence, JohnnyNighttrain will tell us he was just drinking with miyamoto and after telling Johhny how wise and insightful he is he showed him a holographic zelda time machine etc. etc.
Musashi Wins! said:it's hard not to bitch at this launch though. you want to be wowed, I wanted an excuse to throw $$$ at the thing and get all next-gen in my gaming but they seem to want to make that impossible to do and not feel like an idiot.
The Faceless Master said:that's assuming it's higher than $299 ...
sangreal said:The difference with the PS3 is that Sony has come out sand said all along that the PS3 will be expensive. They've also said all along that HDD may not be standard. Microsoft on the other hand chose to raise expectations, and now they are paying for it.
shpankey said:I'm with you. I am, err, was, a pretty ardent supporter of MSFT and the Xbox. Not because of any loyalties, but because I seen it as a fantastic system, with great games and support and features. I stood up for it when the blatant fanboys were being, well, blatent, closed minded fanboys. Eventually most everyone came around (goes to show how slow people are to change).
But I am off the X360 bandwagon. Splitting the market with 2 SKU's (the bottom one terrible) and overpricing accesories (to a rediculous level) along with rushed games and a rushed system (came out after PS2, coming out before PS3). I just can't back that.
What they should have done is have a base system with HDD and one wired controller for $299. And then sold the wireless controllers, component cables, remotes, wireless network adapter, xbox live, memory cards, wireless headset and all the other shit as accessories (for a fair price). This would have EASILY covered them on any loses. Hell, you know how many wireless controllers they would sell alone? Nobody would have paid for anything they didn't want this way and the HDD would have been standard and everyone happy.
I am completely off the X360 bandwagon and doubt I'll ever get on. PS3 or bust.
Amir0x said:It was just an example, as I said above. It could be anything.
Jagernaut said:Definitely, most people would be better off waiting until the PS3 launches to buy a X360. The prices will certainly go down when Microsoft is forced to compete, and Gears of War and 2nd gen games will look a lot better than the rushed launch games.
The difference with the PS3 is that Sony has come out sand said all along that the PS3 will be expensive. They've also said all along that HDD may not be standard. Microsoft on the other hand chose to raise expectations, and now they are paying for it.
Mrbob said:No company is perfect and Sony will do some things wrong too, but they seem to be decent at keeping mistakes to a minimum. I think everyone is surprised that MS is looking like a rookie out there when this is their second console entry.
Bob White said:2006
Cheaper 360 (maybe)
Better 360 games (no doubt)
PS3 released
Revolution released
And to top it all off, a nice little chunk of time would have passed since the last system releases in 2000 and 2001.
Next Gen begins in 2006, regardless of Xbox 3DO coming in 2005.
Simply put, MS launched too fucking early.
Sony has the luxury of name brand recognition on the highest level though. Overcoming any mistakes they make (as long as not monumental) will be relatively easy. MSFT does not have that luxury.sonycowboy said:Sony has plenty of opportunities to fuck things up, don't worry.
Issues out there for the PS3
---------------------------------
1) Pricing (Ken's been laying it on real thick)
2) HDD (at least, with Microsoft's bundle, the HDD adoption will be relatively high early on)
3) Online (Huge, huge chore to match up against Xbox Live)
4) Dev Kits (WAYYY behind microsoft in terms of units shipped, although ahead in terms of functionality)
5) Blu-Ray (if it loses the HD movie battle, it will be an expensive component to keep around)
6) Standard items (Wireless controller? HDMI cables? (not bloodly likely), online subscription, etc)
7) Will it allow open standards items (vs Microsoft seriously tightening up the box) like allowing game saves to CF, SD memory cards or just Memory Stick? Will it allow USB drives?
8) Timing - When can it hit the various regions?
Lunar Aura said:MS has gained ALOT of momentum coming off the 2001 stigmata of the "xbrick" and the system that was thought to be DOA.
What the hell? How can you come to that conclusion? This generation reached its zenith just last Christmas, and there is still a lot left.Lunar Aura said:why? this gen has lasted far too long...
shpankey said:To be fair, momentum is usually not something tangible. Take sports for example... you can clearly tell when a team gets momentum (or loses it) but it would be difficult to say exactly when or how they did. But it is very real nevertheless.
Lunar Aura said:why? this gen has lasted far too long and launching "early"gives MS the luxury of having better games next year. while the ps3 has its fantavisions and bouncers, the 360 will have its halos and gears of wars.
Lunar Aura said:MS has gained ALOT of momentum coming off the 2001 stigmata of the "xbrick" and the system that was thought to be DOA.
Yes, of course. But, momentum is such an abstract thing... it is difficult to quantify. I think the problem here is you see momentum as either having it all or none at all. The Xbox certainly gained some momentum. How much that is, I don't know... I won't attempt to quantify it. But I will say it could certainly lose what it has gained (or somehow gain more); but my bet is on losing it all.Amir0x said:While this is true, this is NOT sports. Events can almost always be clearly tied with any significant shift, which we have not yet seen. Momentum is a word in this industry that underdogs use to try to explain the cavernous gaps between Sony and everyone else in terms of sales and developer support. It means nothing at all, and is usually tied to lots of excuses.
Lunar Aura said:MS has gained ALOT of momentum coming off the 2001 stigmata of the "xbrick" and the system that was thought to be DOA.
shpankey said:Yes, of course. But, momentum is such an abstract thing... it is difficult to quantify. I think the problem here is you see momentum as either having it all or none at all. The Xbox certainly gained some momentum. How much that is, I don't know... I won't attempt to quantify it. But I will say it could certainly lose that (or gain more). My bet is on losing it all.
stop postingMooreberg said:Xbots am suiciding?
![]()
shpankey said:Yes, of course. But, momentum is such an abstract thing... it is difficult to quantify. I think the problem here is you see momentum as either having it all or none at all. The Xbox certainly gained some momentum. How much that is, I don't know... I won't attempt to quantify it. But I will say it could certainly lose that (or gain more). My bet is on losing it all.
Lunar Aura said:MS has gained ALOT of momentum coming off the 2001 stigmata of the "xbrick" and the system that was thought to be DOA.
AniHawk said:that's the worst troll towards the ps3 I've ever heard.
Lunar Aura said:MS has gained ALOT of momentum coming off the 2001 stigmata of the "xbrick" and the system that was thought to be DOA.
Wario64 said:Damage control by saying the blu-ray drive makes it worth the high price. Plus backwards compatability
shpankey said:Who the fuck can support monkeys? I am not a monkey supporter. I need to back homosapiens.
Varian said:I think the roundtable format was a great idea. Much more informative than anything MS has done.
If you do this in the future Che, you ought to clean yourself up a little before appearing on camera. Comb the hair, trim the sideburns, etc. Jane, now there's a professional.
Varian said:I think the roundtable format was a great idea. Much more informative than anything MS has done.
If you do this in the future Che, you ought to clean yourself up a little before appearing on camera. Comb the hair, trim the sideburns, etc. Jane, now there's a professional.
super-heated plasma said:Read. Thats the worst troll you've ever read.
;p j/k
Zer0 said:damage control is speaking about the ps3 price when the question is the 360![]()
chespace said:You bitches, I was trying my hardest to defend Microsoft.
But no amount of damage control can get me to think that paying 100 bucks for a 20 gig HDD (or wi-fi adapter) is a good value. That's basically 500 bucks for your "complete" package.
Then there are the games...