I'm not really sure what your point is tbh. It's expected for a game to have lower attendance numbers when it no longer has the fresh new car smell. A while back For Honor was the hot new thing and now not so much.
This only really applies for traditional retail ship-and-forget games
which very few successful competitive games currently use. The point of moving to Games as a Service as a release model for games is to have an initial launch
and then grow from that launch, either immediately or after you address issues that cause you to bleed players. If your peak userbase is at launch for a Games as a Service style release,
you fucked up and failed. That's not what healthy games with long term support do right after launch.
I guess if you think needless negativity is a positive contribution to a discussion, that's on you. I'm not really sure what value someone posting "The community has no obligation to prop up trash games... SF5 absolutely deserves to get dumpstered... SF5 as it currently is deserves nothing" has, though.
Criticism is one thing. Constructive criticism is a positive force. I'm not saying SFV is a perfect game or doesn't have flaws. IMO people shitposting about a game that other people like is toxic and damaging to the community. Just let people play the game that they want to play. I played SF4 for almost about 6 years and started to hate it at the end. Just because I hated it, does that give me the right to tell everyone else that their opinion is invalid and that the game is trash?
Obviously everyone has their right to their own opinion and obviously it's a forum that facilitates free discussion, but negativity is awful for community development.
I could go into more detail about why I think SF5 is a dumpster fire of a release, but it's something that I've done multiple times already and I think it would be fruitless at this point (if it's something that would even be read). That and all of the constructive criticism in the world will be for naught because the organization that needs to execute the required changes is some combination of unwilling and/or unable to make those changes.
Ultimately, I probably should move on -- if you enjoy the game, enjoy it for what it is, while it lasts. That's ultimately none of my business. It just greatly irritates me to see a community and a genre that I've put a lot of time (and a fair amount of money) into with people that I had a connection with piss away opportunity after opportunity through the unforced errors of people and organizations they have little to no control over. The shitposting isn't just done for shits and giggles.