rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
Mine is not. Must be an unique build.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
GTA5 Single Player : PS5 or PC??
- Thread starter Mindman
- Start date
Bojji
Member
Native (good) implementation of HDR and TAA, PS5 is really quite good.
PC have other advantages but I'm fucking salty that I can't access it anymore on EGS for some reason (RSC won't let me play, suggest to log in to some bullshit account and I'm sure I used my standard email when I activated this game). Fuck them.
Team Andromeda
Member
Series X
GametimeUK
Member
If you're not looking to mod the game and just want an out of the box experience then PS5 is better than PC if you're playing at 60fps.
I recall the image quality being much better on PS5 than PC at the same resolution.
I recall the image quality being much better on PS5 than PC at the same resolution.
rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
Has it? Doesn't happen here.
Last edited:
The Stig
Member
Killer8
Member
PS5 if you want vanilla. Image quality is better with TAA, they improved the flickering SSAO, depth of field actually works at high res, and there is both ray traced shadows and reflections added in a later patch, which still haven't been added to PC. The DuelSense haptics are also quite nice.
violence
Member
Even cutscenes? Nice.
rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
Not sure. But I don't play in cutscenes so would not affect anything significant.
nkarafo
Member
This is one of the worst, most confusing comparison videos. They randomly mix low settings PC, high settings PC, performance/fidelity console settings.
From what i could gather, PC version has better anisotropic filtering. And Michael's hair had a glitch on console at some point. And the explosions look better on PC.
Also, PC low settings is not the equivalent of console performance mode. That would be a "balanced" PC settings.
But this is IGN. Too lazy to figure out what settings do what. They are not Digital Foundry so why even bother doing comparison videos?
Last edited:
rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
And worse in resolution/sharpness with bad to no AF filtering. Plus we can inject more post AAs and/or use supersampling.
Last edited:
Jigsaah
Gold Member
I generally play it on PC because my TV only does 120 fps via interpolation. Would generally prefer the options and mods you get on PC as well. Since you own both though, I would play where you get the best performance. It sounds like PC but I don't know the rest of your setuip.
For instance, are you playing on a TV regardless of the platform? If not then you are choosing between a typically smaller monitor vs a larger TV. If screen size matters, particularly for cutscenes and such, I'd go with PS5. Or you might prefer a smaller screen...so then, PC.
For instance, are you playing on a TV regardless of the platform? If not then you are choosing between a typically smaller monitor vs a larger TV. If screen size matters, particularly for cutscenes and such, I'd go with PS5. Or you might prefer a smaller screen...so then, PC.
SoloCamo
Member
This is such a big gripe for me. Console devs ignore AF as if it's hard to run at all.... Makes almost zero performance difference but the visual quality change is massive.
yamaci17
Member
visual change is massive if you're primarily playing on a monitor or if you're somewhat close to your TV than the average casual player is
there's a reason blurry TAA became so widespread because it is only a problem up close or on a monitor (so you need extremely high resolutions to fix it). while a ps4/one s + TV user from a medium/long distance does not even care how blurry RDR 2 is at 1080p and 864p respectively
all graphics design choices are made for people who play at long distances at this point. and for that reason, it is easy to see why devs would set it to 4x and forget because realistically their main target of userbase won't care/notice
that is also why nvidia/amd etc. has dedicated AF enhancer settings even in their control panel. because if 4x was the untweakable standard on PC, it would cause massive outcries.
look at horizon forbidden west. had ugly overdone sharpening on console for 2 years. barely anyone complains. you bring the same sharpening to PC version and forums are full of complaints about it. because sharpening does not look good and creates a lot of artifacts that are noticable if you're close to your screen.
Last edited:
rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
If you can't see that bad level of AF or you need glasses or you are too far from your screen plus missing to see tons of details in your games.
Last edited:
Hawking Radiation
Member
Well that's pretty messed up. I just installed and started playing the game yesterday as I never finished it. Been looking around for mods that don't hurt FPS as I'm hovering around 100FPS (on Ultra) on vanilla version.
Having no raytracing on PC is just dumb. There has to be a mod out there that implements it. Would likely take a hit to FPS but I've got enough headroom for that.
The functions are not in the PC version because Rockstar straight up don't give a shit about PC players, the game doesn't use the higher resolution textures and extra detail models added in the PS5/XSX versions (mainly vehicle related).
