When the CMA blocked the deal didn't the stock go up for Activision?Hmmm
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hmmm
![]()
![]()
![]()
See Jim? Just make more of those Mario and Zelda games.
Damn, the judge is out for blood.![]()
Because its probably not possible to get telemetry data for mobile or PC. Who are you going to? PC is an open platform and I doubt Google/Apple will give Microsoft any of their mobile data to challenge their duopolywhy do you think she is talking about xbox and Playstation telemetry data not mobile or PC?
im shocked xbox fans are giving this lady praise, her argument was objectively weak unless there's stronger visual evidence that we can't see.
They're giving her praise cause they heard Dr. Lee speak in circles for a hour lolim shocked xbox fans are giving this lady praise, her argument was objectively weak unless there's stronger visual evidence that we can't see.
Microsoft went up, Activision went down.When the CMA blocked the deal didn't the stock go up for Activision?
Please, give me a break. You telling me Activision don't have telemetry data from mobile or PC? What even are you arguing? She was saying "we found gamers are the same age everywhere in the world so they don't differ in their decision making it's global" which is the biggest crock of shit I've heard.Because its probably not possible to get telemetry data for mobile or PC. Who are you going to? PC is an open platform and I doubt Google/Apple will give Microsoft any of their mobile data to challenge their duopoly
It doesn't matter the substance of anything she says. If they're on MS's side, they automatically "win" in the eyes of the Xbox fanatics.
TBF, there has been some of that happening with PlayStation fanatics on everything the FTC's presented, even when some things were a bit on the weaker side there here and there. But it's nowhere to the level of those doing it for Xbox/Microsoft.
This explains so much and i feel so sorry for my American folks, if this is what attempts to protect consumers from major deals look like, i cant even imagine how much less effort they put into smaller deals. Dr. Lee wasnt even able to answer half the stuff while Bailey actually came with preparation, what a contrast.
Weird how all of his analysis was market shift WORLDWIDE then.And Dr Lee would be right. Japan for example plays less COD than the US and the fact that they're the same age is so irrelevant that it's comical people are cheerleading this analysis.
I thought he was examined almost exclusively by the judge?What you heard was Lee being cross examined by MS ‘s counsel. IE hostile.
You need to be careful when posting pictures of women. We haveVarteras ready and waiting.
Plummeted like a rock. Go look at the past 6 month chart on their stock.When the CMA blocked the deal didn't the stock go up for Activision?
oh ok, my mistake.Microsoft went up, Activision went down.
I thought he was examined by the judge?
I'm curious what Sony's strategy on this note looks like. Realistically, I think it is going to involve at least 1 or 2 mid-sized 3P publishers. Square-Enix is a very strong bet, the second one is open to some speculation though. Personally, I think it would probably be Capcom.
But outside that, I'm wondering if the strategy also involves key investments and share purchases, because that will be very important too. They will probably need to buy notable amount of shares in a lot of the big 3P publishers, and make some upfront investments in a few of them, like what they've done with Epic. That would also avoid all of the headaches that come with getting approval for these bigger gaming acquisitions. Maybe Sony just goes for one key publisher and the other acquisitions are centered on developers specifically? Hard to know right now.
Personally I don't see Sony trying to acquire a Western 3P publisher. No CDPR, no Take-Two, no EA or Ubisoft. But I can easily see them buying notable amounts of shares in them, particularly CDPR and Take-Two, and making upfront investments in them. If they do acquire Square-Enix, they will probably come to some agreement with Nintendo on access to certain IP like Dragon Quest and Octopath Traveler. If they acquire Capcom (less likely but would be a 2nd pick), again they'd probably reach an agreement w/ Nintendo on access to IP like Monster Hunter and Ace Attorney. I don't know if they'd extent the same to Microsoft and honestly, they don't need to on virtue neither publisher gets any significant amount of revenue off Xbox sales, since Xbox contributes so little to their revenue as-is.
Because it let them completely misrepresent the statistics by making the first day's use of the PS5 all important - where gamers typically would play something new with next-gen graphics like GoW - as a means of massively under tracking how many PS5 gamers were buying it primarily for CoD.why do they compare GOW and COD as if sony just recently brought GOW? its always been on playstation compared to COD which is multiplatform i dont get the angle..
Entertaining.Any bets on how tomorrow's testimony will go?
no one's talking about this?
Because, like throwing to RBs in the west coast offense, it's fundamental to the playbook.why do they compare GOW and COD as if sony just recently brought GOW? its always been on playstation compared to COD which is multiplatform i dont get the angle..
Yeah Sony, just spend 30 years building up a once-in-a-lifetime breakout IP like Pokemon. It's easy!!
You could buy a PS5 with GoW and buy CoD as a digital deluxe or as a physical discounted copy, used or discounted new and spend less than getting a PS5 bundled with CoD, and then having to buy the digital CoD extras and buy GoW at the full 70 day one price.
Or Spiderman? God of War? Horizon? TLOU?
Everyone is considered to be price sensitive in gaming, and the economist used a dubious anecdote about choosing her own bundle for her PS5, when the Judge cottoned on to whether gamers actual got a choice of bundle or not when they went to buy.Or Spiderman? God of War? Horizon? TLOU?
The mass market isn't doing that. C'mon.
”There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark TwainLooks like Dr. Bailey kinda threw Dr. Lee under the bus.
Poor Lee, he probably didn't have this in his diary when he arrived.
![]()
![]()
Or Spiderman? God of War? Horizon? TLOU?
Sony will either target a bigger company that checks off multiple boxes for them or a series of smaller ones to cover their bases. Sony wants that mobile market. But right now, their strategy for it is way too slow and banking way too much on luck. The only two realistic targets for Sony to get really big into mobile overnight are CyberAgent and Take-Two. Though the latter is immensely more expensive and will absolutely get serious regulatory scrutiny. But it also comes with a number of great IP. Which Sony can feed into their expanding entertainment ventures. Square Enix also checks a lot of boxes for Sony. Live service, mobile, RPGs, and great transmedia opportunities. Not to mention their solid, long-running relationship.
Sony has likely already been looking into their current capital alliance with Kadokawa, of which CyberAgent is also a part of, and their current 14% ownership of FromSoft. I will not be surprised in the least bit if Sony makes a move there in some way. Buying Kadokawa or increasing their share percentage in both them and FromSoft. Could even make a play to buy out Kadokawa's majority ownership and get into some kind of agreement with them to help them further their other agendas. There really aren't that many large independent developers left so I wouldn't expect much in that area. They could surprise us and announce that they bought Remedy or People Can Fly, but I don't know how much value they see in them. Especially when they could be looking at $400+million for either one.
CDP, EA, Ubisoft, Bandai, Konami, Koei, Embracer, Sega... you're just not going to convince me that any of those are on Sony's radar. Capcom is the only other major company I think Sony would make a play for, and I honestly believe that will happen only in a purely defensive move where they get wind that they are seriously considering an offer from a competitor. I still think Sony will look mostly towards smaller companies with clear talent.
Homie the FTC and the courts already have a federal trial scheduled to litigate this acquisition, that's the real trial. There is only one reason why the FTC would request a restraining order + PI that prevents a company from closing and that's because they were told they'd close, that is the purpose of a PI. You don't waste a courts resources asking for restraining orders on things that aren't happening... Could you imagine a world where you can waste a Judges time asking for things without any justification as to why you need them?
Homie the FTC and the courts already have a federal trial scheduled to litigate this acquisition, that's the real trial. There is only one reason why the FTC would request a restraining order + PI that prevents a company from closing and that's because they were told they'd close, that is the purpose of a PI. You don't waste a courts resources asking for restraining orders on things that aren't happening... Could you imagine a world where you can waste a Judges time asking for things without any justification as to why you need them?
Here's another lesson for you: the preliminary in preliminary injunction means "prior/preceding" the matter being settled in the actual trial. If US law worked like you imagined the FTC would have filed the restraining order and PI in December not now. PI motions are rare and hard to attain because acquisitions are allowed to close by default in the US as the FTC and DOJ have the power to litigate after closing.
did the day finish? I am not keep tracking?
what happened to Nadella?
did the day finish? I am not keep tracking?
what happened to Nadella?
Exactly, I mean how do you look at a statistic like this:”There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
If Sony could acquire Kadokawa though, that would be a big get and get them a lot of what they need.
Exactly, I mean how do you look at a statistic like this:
And conclude that globally it's all similar in competition concerns. There could be 11 people from NA and 1 guy from Croatia and it would be included in the percentage of lobbies/groups that had an international player but the NA players would be where your main market is and where you make the most money since it outweighs it 11 to 1. It was heavily massaged data.
Pain!Any bets on how tomorrow's testimony will go?