nkarafo
Member
Come on man. Stop this shit. You complain about others preaching about 60fps and here you are, spreading this "human eye can't see more than x amount" bullshit.I'd be fine if they were 30 fps. Anyone who preaches otherwise is a fool.
Let's be honest, 60 or more fps is just a stupid, smarmy, whitty, thing to preach about online to strangers so you sound sophisticated. Its like a high school kid giving some pedestrian interpretation of catcher in the rye to some middle schoolers so he sound savvy.
40 something fps is the optimal fps a human eye can full process. Anything beyond that begins to drastically become less noticeable. 35 to 45 is the optimal range. 99.5% of all movies are shot at 35fps and it's just fine for everyone because that is the speed at which the majority of people can see.
Any simple research into the biology of the human eye will tell you that. But reality gets trumped by what's cool to say.
So no we don't need more fps, what we really need is reliable fps, not more.
You can see beyond 60fps even. Unless you have some eye/brain condition i dont know about. I can tell the difference between 120 and 240 hz if the speed is high enough. Virtual pinball requires at least 120 fps for me. Lower than that isn't enough visual information for the fast moving ball.
Im not Superman. I have human eyes.
Last edited: