• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Series X|S Parity Clause Changed: BG3 coming to Xbox this year, no split screen coop for Series S

Lysandros

Member
Like "power of the cloud" and "PS5 SSD magic"?

Excited Season 4 GIF by The Office
What do you mean by "PS5 SSD magic"?
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
Well fuck me, Microsoft, you gone done a goodie.

Clapping Applause GIF by Soul Train


Now just drop the whole stupid ass Series S thing completely, and make me glad I bought a Series X again.

….start with letting Starfield have 60fps on X.
It's terrible when you consider this good PR lol

And yeah it is terrible. That's the stage of affairs at Xbox these days when they don't know how to run their gaming business.
 

SF Kosmo

Al Jazeera Special Reporter
They could have made this decision a year ago and had the game at launch, but the dummies didn't realize this game was going to be huge.
 

jm89

Member
Sony was heavily implying that load times and gameplay experiences would be impossible without the power of PS5 SSD. The game used the most to showcase that was Ratchet & Clank that launched on PC….without requiring an SSD drive at all, let alone a special one.
I don't think they said it would be impossible.

Also Ranchet and clank load times are dreadful between rifts without an ssd.
 
Last edited:

Portugeezer

Member
Sony was heavily implying that load times and gameplay experiences would be impossible without the power of PS5 SSD. The game used the most to showcase that was Ratchet & Clank that launched on PC….without requiring an SSD drive at all, let alone a special one.
I watched some DF videos and they're pretty adamant the game would not be possible on the PS4.

I don't feel like going back to watch some old developer interview to see the context weather it was a PS4 comparison or overall. If you could provide context that'd be great.
 

Topher

Gold Member
Sony was heavily implying that load times and gameplay experiences would be impossible without the power of PS5 SSD. The game used the most to showcase that was Ratchet & Clank that launched on PC….without requiring an SSD drive at all, let alone a special one.

All of that was before tech like Direct Storage and RTX IO was available on PC. I don't think they ever suggested that only the technology behind PS5 SSD would ever be able to accomplish this. They were saying they couldn't do it on PS4 where none of this tech was available.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Wait, is starfield supporting cross save with Steam?


Correct



It has been officially confirmed that Starfield will feature full cross-progression support across all available platforms. This means you can seamlessly transfer your progress between Xbox Series X/S, Windows Store, Steam, Xbox Games Pass, PC Game Pass, and Xbox Cloud Gaming. No matter where and how you play, you can always continue your adventure right where you left off on any platform where the game is available.
 

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
Both terrible af, for comparision from official data provided by both sony and ms, playstation 5 outsold series x/s almost 2:1 by now, worldwide, so if u compare more expensive ps5 vs much cheaper xss its over 2:1 difference, and its getting worse and worse, meaning even casual customers realised how bad of a deal series s is, vs ps5.
Now going forward u will have ps5 slim, dunno if cheaper or maybe at 400$ vs 1tb xss at 350$, u dont need to be hardward graduate or rocket science physicist to predict the bloodbath thats gonna happen next few years.

Your missing the point completely, if there was no series S, ms sales of series consoles would be even worse, like 3:1 or even 4:1 to ps5.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
More like your post should exist since it has no merit. Honestly mods should probably just ban everyone who runs into a series S thread to say this, since it's meaningless at this point. It exists, people like it, they sell games for it, it's going to be sold for years to come. It's time to move on.
The series S is a POS in 2023 and beyond. Glad MS is finally recognizing their mistake in trying to disrupt the industry. Gamescom Q&As, social media trends and dev rumblings worked when you're not the market leader but want to still carry the hubris. Humbling, this.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
I don't think they said it would be impossible.

Also Ranchet and clank load times are dreadful between rifts without an ssd.

They kinda did

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is a game that utilizes dimensions and dimensional rifts, and that would not have been possible without the solid-state drive of the PlayStation 5.

 

ShaiKhulud1989

Gold Member
Sony was heavily implying that load times and gameplay experiences would be impossible without the power of PS5 SSD. The game used the most to showcase that was Ratchet & Clank that launched on PC….without requiring an SSD drive at all, let alone a special one.
Per DF, HDD R&C runs abysmal with lowest possible targets and long load times that sucks all the magic. Pregnancy test can run DOOM too, but is it playable?
 

Topher

Gold Member
They kinda did




No, that quote is taken out of context by damn near everyone, even me for a while. In the video, right before that quote he clearly says "this is something we never could have done on previous generations". So no....he wasn't saying this could never be done by any other tech than PS5 ever. Prior generations didn't have any of this tech and that's what he was talking about.
 
Last edited:

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
No, that quote is taken out of context by damn near everyone, even me for a while. In the video, right before that quote he clearly says "this is something we never could have done on previous generations". So no....he wasn't saying this could never be done by any other tech than PS5 ever. Prior generations didn't have any of this tech and that's what he was talking about.

I'm not sure it's quite out of context. This is the entire segment.

The "We couldn't do it in previous generations" is about the amount of enemies, effects etc that the previous gen wouldn't be able to do, at least that's what it reads like to me.

The number of objects in the world and the things to explore, the enemies around, the effects, everything is more, more, more. This is what we’re trying to do is build worlds that feel real and are bringing you in. You’re exploring these brand new spaces. And this is something that we never could have done on previous generations.

Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is a game that utilizes dimensions and dimensional rifts, and that would not have been possible without the solid-state drive of the PlayStation 5. The SSD is screamingly fast. It allows us to build worlds and project players from one place to another in near instantaneous speeds. It is an unbelievable game changer in terms of, we can now do gameplay where you’re in one world, and the next moment you’re in another.
 
Last edited:
Sure, let's just shit on all the people that bought Series S because they were promised "like XSX, just 1080p". Also it might shock you - some people have only one console, and it's Series S.
This is all MS fault bro. Trying to be clever and cute by releasing a bottom tier console to beat sony on price thinking it would win them the gen. Instead of focusing on what their customers actually wanted.
 
Last edited:

ShaiKhulud1989

Gold Member
Also, about split-screen. I always play split-screen with my wife. Diablo 3, DoS2 was a ton of quality family time together. If BG3 kept this feature, it's beause Larian saw in their internal stats that it's sought for. Especially if we speak about tabletop-like game, where people usually scream, laugh and dring in one room.
 
Where does it say the parity clause has been changed? This sounds like a one-off exception that Phil personally approved. Due to all the bad press about the BG3 delay on Xbox.

I’m not seeing any mention anywhere at all on the actual parity clause changing, for all Series developers. Do you have a source?
 
Last edited:

PeteBull

Member
Your missing the point completely, if there was no series S, ms sales of series consoles would be even worse, like 3:1 or even 4:1 to ps5.
Actions have consequences, MS fucked themselfs/their console many times over so ofc instead of praising MAUs ppl check sales, as any1 sane should, somehow nintendo got no problems with sales of their very weak/outdated handheld tech based switch, but for that u gotta have top quality of exclusives instead of gamepass, its a trade off, one company banked on gamepass, other one banked on top quality exclusives as it was always proven strategy that worked well ;)
 
That's quite a leap there.
Last gen, Xbox released like 4 different Xbox one models. If they can do a Series X all digital and get the price to like $350, I can see this replacing the Series S.

The series s only exist because it’s cheap, if they can make another cheap alternative I think they will replace it.
 

Interfectum

Member
Where does it say the parity clause has been changed? This sounds like a one-off exception that Phil personally approved. Due to all the bad press about the BG3 delay on Xbox.

I’m not seeing any mention anywhere at all on the actual parity clause changing, for all Series developers. Do you have a source?
You think MS is going to deny other exceptions after this very public change? It's not good business to give special privileges to certain developers over others.
 
We all called bullshit from day one. But the brand defense ran rampant in the ever shifting narratives. Remember when they removed the 1440p from marketing very quickly as well. Never forget.

They can't cancel this....

0:38-1:57 (Timestamped)




Then again (Timesamped)

 
Last edited:
It makes sense to drop the clause. They can’t cut Series S off altogether as it’s the majority of their installed base. What we’ll see are more and more moves to keep it on life support as time goes on.
 

Gambit2483

Member
The biggest admission the series s is a huge fuck up.

Shills: Thanks uncle phil. Slurp slurp slurp.
I'd rather they admit it and fix the situation moving forward than to just ignore it or pretend the issue doesn't exist.

This is great news and one step closer to the Series X living up to its full potential.
 

Atrus

Gold Member
Not having the GotY 2023 launch on your system in 2023 and instead be an unintentional exclusive for your rivals was a completely unfathomable and stupid mistake, so it’s good to see that reality caught up to someone with brains over at Microsoft.
 

StereoVsn

Member
The series S is a POS in 2023 and beyond. Glad MS is finally recognizing their mistake in trying to disrupt the industry. Gamescom Q&As, social media trends and dev rumblings worked when you're not the market leader but want to still carry the hubris. Humbling, this.
I don't think it's a POS even in 2023 if it was priced right. XSS at $200-250 is a great device that can be main streaming box, play whole Xbox library, stream games form the cloud, etc... Couple that with Game pass and it's a great kids gaming device.

It just can't have feature party clause with XSX or the insane $350 price MS is about to start pushing. At $350 it is indeed a POS.
 

Bridges

Member
Great news. I doubt there are too many that will care, and if they make it work then they can patch it in later (I wonder if this is what happened with Halo Infinite?)

Btw, I see crossprogression, but is it crossplay?
 

ADiTAR

ידע זה כוח
I'd rather they admit it and fix the situation moving forward than to just ignore it or pretend the issue doesn't exist.

This is great news and one step closer to the Series X living up to its full potential.
This is bad news, I don't understand how it can be good news for the brand. It might be good news for you, but as a brand this is basically burying it deeper in poop.

They are basically going to fracture their user base, and now would sorta have to cater to two different user bases. So companies will now dump whatever on Series S maybe unoptimized, maybe just to get it running (let's say 720p, and bye Felicia), while Series X will get the actual game.

This Xbox brand just keeps hurting. At first I thought why didn't they call Game Pass, Xpass or something (without the porn ref), but now it's good that they can separate it from their nose diving brand.
 
You think MS is going to deny other exceptions after this very public change? It's not good business to give special privileges to certain developers over others.

That’s fine. My point is more that the thread title specifically says the parity clause has been changed. And I’m saying all we know about what is what Larian said about one game after one meeting. We don’t actually have any official communication or comment from Msoft that the clause has been altered.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Great news. I doubt there are too many that will care, and if they make it work then they can patch it in later (I wonder if this is what happened with Halo Infinite?)

Btw, I see crossprogression, but is it crossplay?


I think it means your save / profile will carry over between devices, so you can use the same character and progression on PC and Xbox.
 

twilo99

Member
Last gen, Xbox released like 4 different Xbox one models. If they can do a Series X all digital and get the price to like $350, I can see this replacing the Series S.

The series s only exist because it’s cheap, if they can make another cheap alternative I think they will replace it.

Of course, but making a cheap alternative is very difficult, which is exactly why we have the xss where compromises had to be made to meet that price point.

A digital xsx would probably be $50-60 dollars cheaper?
 

Interfectum

Member
That’s fine. My point is more that the thread title specifically says the parity clause has been changed. And I’m saying all we know about what is what Larian said about one game after one meeting. We don’t actually have any official communication or comment from Msoft that the clause has been altered.
Hey man, just trying to stay modern with the high drama thread titles. I need them clicks and likes to feel good. :messenger_sunglasses:
 
The beginning of Series S downfall.
Developers will be allowed to cut more and more features by threatening to not release the game on Xbox at all.
They've been doing that for years on the Switch.

It's a lower spec console, soon enough Digital Foundry will be using the "MIRACLE PORT" theme on articles about it.

Regardless, I don't give two rats ass about coop, and it's only normal that some parity can be ignored on a case by case basis. You're paying less, I'm not sure who would be upset with some features not being possible on the weakest denominator, as long as the base game can cope.
 

Interfectum

Member
Super lame and misleading. But ok I guess! I don’t make the rules around here
Considering none of us have actually seen the parity clause document and have gone off of developer information and opinions anyway, I'm not sure what's misleading here. They made an exception for Larian which means their policy has changed. There are no public one-offs.
 
Last edited:

SkylineRKR

Member
Of course, but making a cheap alternative is very difficult, which is exactly why we have the xss where compromises had to be made to meet that price point.

A digital xsx would probably be $50-60 dollars cheaper?

Digital PS5 is 100 cheaper, so XSX could in theory have done the same thing. And the PS5 DE is much better value proposition; its bonafide current-gen, bigger SSD. Sony isn't going to face parity issues when developing a game.

Because MS is stuck with XSS, even if they discontinue it in the near future. They can't abandon development for it and they can't gimp games too hard. They need to continue to consider it when developing games. There is a userbase of millions of XSS users out there, and its supposed to be a tandem with XSX. Discontinue software for it would kill them on the spot.
 
Top Bottom