Our country is so divided among partisan lines that this couldn't be simply a shooting at a baseball practice, but they specifically HOP one.
Sigh.
There was a GOP pol who went on to become a gun control advocate after being shot - I want to say - in the attempted Reagan assassination?
Are people cheering this unaware that they're the same as the GOP Rep cheering a suicide bombing because it happened against Iran?
In case you are wondering who to blame, check Twitter. Apparently, "the media" caused this to happen.
people thinking this could lead to more gun control are delusional
this will only lead to more monitoring of civilians
50 bullets really isn't that many if you're a gun aficionado with that kind of weapon. I think it was targeted, but that's less ammunition than you think.
Reagan supported gun control because black panthers stood in front of the California Capitol Building.
Sen. Jeff Flake: "African-American gentleman brought down the shooter."
Rep Mo Brooks: "White, middle aged male, appears to be on the chubby side"
50 bullets really isn't that many if you're a gun aficionado with that kind of weapon. I think it was targeted, but that's less ammunition than you think.
Our country is so divided among partisan lines that this couldn't be simply a shooting at a baseball practice, but they specifically HOP one.
Sigh.
In case you are wondering who to blame, check Twitter. Apparently, "the media" caused this to happen.
It is America so it could just be a run of the mill public shooting.
I mean if I had to wildly speculate, and if what Mo Brooks said is true—that the shooter asked whether the players were Republicans or Democrats before opening fire—my guess would be the shooter is someone badly affected by the AHCA.This has to be politically motivated...to much of a coincidence otherwise.
Wait till some of the Draconian measures (like healthcare) the GOP plans to implement start taking effect. In a country where its easier to get a gun then to vote the GOP will have millions of desperate people armed to the teeth to worry about.
No.Is this the Reichstag fire event the left has been foreshadowing since the election?
50 shots and nobody dead tells me 2 things; Either this shooter had no idea how to shoot, or they didn't want to actually kill anyone.
An AR15 is an extremely accurate hunting rifle that fires a .233/5.56 bullet. 50 shots would be a mag dump + 20 shots (possibly a drum mag?).
Even an average shooter (like myself) with an ar15 can put one in the chest at 100-200 yards.
What I am saying is thankfully this person was inexperienced, or unwilling to kill, because 50 rounds could have lead to multiple fatalities. Hope those injured pull through ok.
50 shots and nobody dead tells me 2 things; Either this shooter had no idea how to shoot, or they didn't want to actually kill anyone.
An AR15 is an extremely accurate hunting rifle that fires a .233/5.56 bullet. 50 shots would be a mag dump + 20 shots (possibly a drum mag?).
Even an average shooter (like myself) with an ar15 can put one in the chest at 100-200 yards.
What I am saying is thankfully this person was inexperienced, or unwilling to kill, because 50 rounds could have lead to multiple fatalities. Hope those injured pull through ok.
Good on him if he's a civilian taking down the shooter. Fuck the shooter.What a twist.
He was a member of Scalise's security detail.Good on him if he's a civilian taking down the shooter. Fuck the shooter.
Good on him if he's a civilian taking down the shooter. Fuck the shooter.
Is this the Reichstag fire event the left has been foreshadowing since the election?
No. It was politically motivated. One of the people leaving said the person identified as the shooter asked if it were Democrats or Republicans on the field. Now it's possible he the shooter would've opened fire either way but I think that's unlikely.
So, what I'm wondering is, if the argument is to be made that the guy would've killed everyone had there not been armed guards there... Why is he in custody without being injured?
Maybe that was the point.It's stupid to say he "deserved" this because Republicans can mobilize crazy and armed people about a thousand times better now that there is a martyr and threat involved.
I got that part, just I wouldn't be surprised if this was a civilian. White supremacy or not, the African American in a position to do something I'd hope they would do it.I believe the 'twist' being referenced is that of Scalise, a white supremacist, being saved from a white shooter by a black guy
So, what I'm wondering is, if the argument is to be made that the guy would've killed everyone had there not been armed guards there... Why is he in custody without being injured?
Are we advocating for drive by shootings now?
I thought he was one of the ones shot?
It's stupid to say he "deserved" this because Republicans can mobilize crazy and armed people about a thousand times better now that there is a martyr and threat involved.
Is this the Reichstag fire event the left has been foreshadowing since the election?
I imagine this will join school shootings as a common occurrence in America, especially if the GOP wrecks the lives of millions.
The point was he brought more. It wasn't just somebody concealed carrying or something.50 bullets really isn't that many if you're a gun aficionado with that kind of weapon. I think it was targeted, but that's less ammunition than you think.
The GOP needs to be brought to task through the courts and elections, not by bullets. I'm glad that no one was killed, I hope that doesn't change and everyone injured makes a full recovery.
No, it wasn't till after his presidency that he supported gun control, and it was mostly due to his wife.
wiki said:Governor Ronald Reagan was present when the protesters arrived and later commented that he saw "no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons" and that guns were a "ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will." In a later press conference, Reagan added that the Mulford Act "would work no hardship on the honest citizen."
I agree with your thought, but I think you have an underlying implication that the shooter is/was not a Republican. I'm not quite sure that is true, and I would not be shocked if the shooter does lean Right.
Not that I expect more from Trump, but if he co-opts this to push partisan bullshit that will be geuinely dangerous and I hope it doesn't happen. I can't imagine the GOP, at least in Congress, Will leap to use this as a cudgel against anyone against them. Giffords set the example in how to handle this.I'm glad nobody was killed at least. It does make me worry if this is a harbinger of things to come though, or worse, the beginning of tit for tat violence once Fox News and Easy D begin selling their narrative.