Such a shallow debate. Unsuprising it comes from US protesters.
Post them
Feet
Leg Lock
Outdoor
Voyeur
Missionary
Loli Femdom (2D)
Bare Legs
X-Ray Intercourse (2D)
Shota+Adult Women (2D)
Small aerolas
.
Such a shallow debate. Unsuprising it comes from US protesters.
Post them
Feet
Leg Lock
Outdoor
Voyeur
Missionary
Loli Femdom (2D)
Bare Legs
X-Ray Intercourse (2D)
Shota+Adult Women (2D)
Small aerolas
Cortana's Halo 3 design seems to be best, imho. When I think of how the average female human being looks, that is pretty much what I see (as far as bosom is concerned) This is our race; this is what we are. Halo 4 went overboard.
Fact is, the females of the Human race have breasts. Deal with it, people!
I don't see what a bunch of weird softcore niche movies have to do with it. To me the issue isn't as much about games like Dragon's Crown existing, as much as how COMPLETELY PERVASIVE the sexualization of women is in all games (see my above Halo example).
Read the entire quote I posted this time.
Uh....no? I don't think I suggested that.Is Japan absolute?
It isn't a strawman argument. You are saying that the depiction of Cortana in Halo 4 is inappropriate, right? But it's a comic book universe through and through. There are purple aliens and giant man-robots with guns. As much as it might disgust you, she fits right into that universe. Actually, the Halo 4 Cortana isn't really all that physiologically excessive in my view. I don't really see the point of giving an AI lifeform a sweater.
Serious deja vu from this thread.
Other AI constructs are fully clothed, conspicuously the sultry female remains essentially naked. To me it's even dumber when you consider the origin story of the AI constructs and how they essentially choose their own form. Mostly all of them choose interesting things / people from history - yet we have 'naked woman' as the one you see all the time.
Just want to know if Japan is more or less comfortable with their games than the West.
"I think Western publishers do similar things, like with GTA, going out to a strip club and other things," Suda says. "But I do understand that if a Western developer was to create something like [Gigolo mode] it could backfire."
Suda says that a sexual undercurrent just fits Killer is Dead.
"I don't really use [sex] as something full frontal, but sexuality is a good way to express a certain element in the game," he says. "Maybe sexuality in games shouldn't be as big a taboo, but at the same time I live in a country where sexuality is pretty crazy."
In regard to Dragon’s Crown specifically, all of its characters literally are tropes: the heavily armored Fighter, the stout and strong Dwarf, the bow wielding Elf, the muscular and powerful Amazon, the mysterious Wizard, and the dark and sexy Sorceress: all established fantasy archetypes. It seems ridiculous to me to criticize tropes for being tropes. Ultimately, you can vote with your wallet. Reward the developers that make the kind of games you like with your business and perhaps they’ll make more of them.
I don't really see the point of making an AI lifeform female, or humanoid, for that matter.I don't really see the point of giving an AI lifeform a sweater.
But it is what it is. It is a comic book sci-fi universe, plenty of which have had naked ladies in them over the years in film and TV (Farscape for example). What is so special about games? And does it really matter?I would like to think games could be more interesting than a 'comic book universe'. Her proportions are fine, but she's essentially naked. You can't see any way that might seem a little out of place?
Developers should make whatever kind of games they want, and people are completely within their rights to protest the games / not buy them.
Other AI constructs are fully clothed, conspicuously the sultry female remains essentially naked. To me it's even dumber when you consider the origin story of the AI constructs and how they essentially choose their own form. Mostly all of them choose interesting things / people from history - yet we have 'naked woman' as the one you see all the time.
I'm surprised so few articles note this very easy to make observation of Dragon's Crown.
Except it's not? I recently played through the original BioShock again and I don't remember any sexualized women in there. I ran through Spec Ops: The Line before that, same thing. How many blockbuster movie stars are unattractive? TV actresses? How about your local weather lady?
It's not a problem with games, it's a problem with men. That's the world we live in.
I see "naked woman" not as perverted, but as one of the most beautiful forms ever seen. Often times angels and goddesses are perceived as nude, because the nude form can be beautiful. So with that in mind, does it not make a little bit of sense that the AI constructs would choose that form?
Just to be clear, I have not played the Halo series, so I don't know anything about its lore.
Yeah, I understand that as successful products of evolutionary biology we enjoy looking at naked women. I also can concede that there might be times were it would make sense, but we are talking about the overwhelming majority of games where all female characters have "made this choice" to wear things that are essentially a second skin.
I think it might just be the overwhelming majority of the games you are playing.
People who only play Nintendo games, or sports games, or strategy games*, etc are generally not subjected to this kind of thing.
*Catherine The Greats massive bust in Civ 5 being the exception.
Fair enough in the sense that not even all games have women in them. I shouldn't have exaggerated, fact remains that a very large majority of women in games are hypersexualized.
Someone should make actual statistics based on that. My personal experience is that it is changing, although bit by bit. And maybe not just because it's stupid to do so, but it's also bad story-telling and bad character design. And people interested in a good story will get turned off by it.
Anyway, I'm just playing through Tales Of Graces and originally I didn't want to buy the game because I expected a JRPG with exactly the stereotypes (big tits, male heroes rescues girl etc.) mentioned here. I was pleasantly surprised that this is not the case. Right at the start there is a little (it's the childhood arc) girl that is actually extremly powerful and protects one of the main (male) characters. And at the end of the childhood arc she. And before someone in here complains about that, because it's the male looking for revenge trope - no it isn't the trope in this game because latereven dies for that mission.she comes back, I haven't finished it so I don't know how this all works out
Also in the adult part of the story at least till now none of the female characters has big boobs or anything. And those female characters also don't wear any sexualized clothing. And the characters have quite a bit of depth to them.
Man, I had the biggest crush on Claire Redfield when I was a kid. Goofy red jacket and all.
Makes me wonder, do these discussions ever happen in Japan?
Look at the evolution of a character like Cortana.
To me, this is the pinnacle of bullshit in gaming. Yes, women have breasts, but no way does this make sense in the context. This, to me, is an example of what's wrong with the way women are portrayed in games as much as Dragon's Crown.
It's like Pamela Anderson popping up in your Word 2000 asking if you meant to indent that paragraph instead of that fucking paperclip.
It's not like tv and films are really overrun with unattractive males either.
In three of those she looks like a cartoon character
and the other one, she looks like an anatomically correct female.
Arguing over sexuality in a medium devoted to escapism sounds like a waste of time.
You're right, of course, but when I see that it strikes me as unusual that the only AI construct that chose to be naked just happens to be the most common and appear in the form of a perfectly fit human female.
I think Samus counts, no one even knew she was a girl until she stripped down to her 8 bit bikini. Now we have the zero suit. I'm telling you, most of GAF is so deep into it they can't see out.
They actually care about objectification of women in the real world, and not in fiction.
Arguing over sexuality in a medium devoted to escapism sounds like a waste of time. Lack of representation (no female soldiers in mms, lack of female leads), harmful gender stereotypes (Princess Peach) or enforced gender roles I will continue to think are more important.
Do developers and publishers hold a responsibility for not designing stereotypical characters (e.g., women with large breasts, men with chizzled pecs, women who are submissive, men who are dude bro)?
When she gives the goofy jacket to Sherry... My heart melts every time,Claire had the best softly spoken voice ever. Anyone would have to be dead inside to not have a crush on her. So caring *O*
This might be the funniest thing I've read all day.They actually care about objectification of women in the real world, and not in fiction.
Here, here.
If you polled every single person who played Halo 4 and asked whether they would prefer Cortona to be "naked" or fully clothed, the majority would choose naked. It would be a fucking landslide. So 343 catered to their audience. Boo hoo!
Search your feelings, you know it to be true.
there's a thread like this every week
And every straight guy here masturbates to objectification of women through porn.
And every straight guy here masturbates to objectification of women through porn.
Developers should make whatever kind of games they want, and people are completely within their rights to protest the games / not buy them.
In what fucking bizarre universe would the only two character designs be "fully clothed" or "naked". I'm not even a creative person and I can come up with character designs that would make more sense than being naked and actually still allow for an interesting character.