Oh come one. No version of a game that's "almost unplayable" would have nearly a million people playing it concurrently.
why don’t you both go make games and I give a review?
ya but they are also bashing elden ring as a game...their games have nothing on elden ring, horizon may be the only one up there..but the dude from bf2042 talking about bad UI BAHJAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAa
Say whatever you want but tech wise is a shit show; I agree it should impact more the review score. Who give a fuck if it's a better game than Horizon. I'm pissed off to see their games plagued with FPS problems, they are incompetent in this front and they should have did something already years ago.
Everyone that plays games
Don't play Elden Ring on PC ... yet
Elden Ring will be a gaming masterpiece once all the PC issues have been ironed out.www.windowscentral.com
Yeah I love it too, perhaps mid was the wrong word to use. But Elden Ring is still much better.
I’m a from fan but damn. You could say that ER has little originality, is an unpolished idea from previous games.
And what kind of excuse is it to justify unstable FPS? It's like years their games offer unstable FPS or frame pacing issue. It's pathetic see a company with such immense success don't give a fuck to the tech aspect of their engines.
Op should be working for a tabloid or IGN.
What is original about ER? It's DS3 in Open World, copying BOTW world design. There's nothing original about it. That's a very bad take.
This was the original comment that started this little tet e tete:
The game runs fine for me so I don't give a shit about PC
Frame rate doesn't actually matter all that much in these games. Both enemy and player attacks are slow with tons of windup and recovery frames, to a point where split-second reaction times barely matter. Positioning, observation, prediction and knowing both your own moveset and that of the enemy are way more important.
Yeh I got it on PS5. It's still a little inconsistent but it's still on average double the frame rate I played all the other souls games at so I'm not complaining.
If devs want a more non-toxic online environment, they should start with themselves.
Elden Ring has performance issues but even with flaws it's more fun to play than any Assassin's Creed game ever made.
The last comment from the Guerilla dev, proves he likes games that guides him - "holds his hand".
To each their own, but dissing a better game than any of those studios ever made is just pathetic.
It’s about how you said it! No wonder many devs stopped using neogaf. Anyway forget it! All this is pointless.
If you think fighting big machine dinosaurs is boring...
Yeah, if you complain about Ubi’s photocopy games you should also acknowledge that From‘s been making essentially the same game for 13 years at this point, and they still refuse to learn a thing or two about interface and features. They’re free to make the game as they want; people should be free to point out the kinks without being ridiculed.
Because they are reviewing the gameplay not the performance. Sadly, it seems that today people are more worried about framerate than gameplay immersion or progression.
Ubisoft and Guerilla - both studios. More than one dev - combined.
This goes against the entire review process.
In the case of Ubisoft, over 20000 people.
The PC version has a lower score.
I think Cyberpunk's bad reviews were because bad performance and bugs had a deep impact in gameplay and promised features. It's not the case for Elden Ring. Yes, it doesn't run at stable 60fps but that's it. I play on ps5 and I didn't find a problem in 40 hours of gameplay. In fact, it's astonishing how bug free is for an open world game, but I imagine that's it because there are no walking NPCs, traffic and other stuff present in open world games.
