• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Internal batteries ARE AN ANTI CONSUMER SCAM

What do You think?

  • Internal is perfect. No complaints

    Votes: 168 29.3%
  • Internal is anti consumer but I do not care

    Votes: 12 2.1%
  • Internal would be great if they offered replacements

    Votes: 96 16.7%
  • Battery door would be better for options

    Votes: 245 42.7%
  • I DO NOT CARE AT ALL

    Votes: 53 9.2%

  • Total voters
    574

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
Works with DS3 and DS4, don't have a Dualsense to test...buuut if there are already DualSenses with dead battery cells out there, holy shit that's a MAJOR FAIL and *should* be a feather in the cap of this thread if true, especially paired with the possibility it won't work wired with a dead cell.
It's lithium ion. It will die.. one controller in 15 years. Other in 2... it's a bit of a luck when it comes to these cells.
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
I knew going when we bought our Mach E that the batteries were quite expensive to mine but now both our homes are 100% solar powered and totally off the electrical grid and in fact we supply electricity back into the grids

Other than traveling back and forth between Indiana and Florida we use next to no gas and charge for free now

I do find it funny when my neighbors brag about their Teslas but are relying on the grid to charge them
Dude don't science fiction me with this shit.
I make 30k a year lol. I live in Poland.
I drive 2008 hyundai 1.6liters :p

edit: but honestly, that's great.
 
Last edited:
If in 10 years you don't need to open your controller to do some repairs, you ain't even using it. By then you should be comfortable changing the rechargeable battery if it gives up. Way better than spending hundreds of dollars buying AA batteries over 10 years.
 
Last edited:

GHG

Member
I 100% agree with you on this. It is far better to replace batteries over the entire controller when those batteries stop holding a charge. I can't understand why anyone would argue to have non-replacable batteries in devices like controllers. You make an excellent point.

Who is forcing you to replace the entire controller though?

Do you move house every time something in your home needs replacing?
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
If in 10 years you don't need to open your controller to do some repairs, you ain't even using it. By then you should be comfortable changing the rechargeable battery if it gives up.
sure. i will do that. I already had to open my dualsense since 2nd returnal boss broke my Right trigger. super easy.
But there are no official batteries sold!
 

Topher

Gold Member
I knew going when we bought our Mach E that the batteries were quite expensive to mine but now both our homes are 100% solar powered and totally off the electrical grid and in fact we supply electricity back into the grids

I've been looking to do that recently. Would love to be entirely off the grid. I'd buy a Tesla in a heartbeat. Imagine never buying gas again. That's the dream....
 

64bitmodels

Reverse groomer.
i agree... but like, this isn't threadworthy
personally i think we should leave a solid state battery in every controller to increase battery life and be done with this bullshit.

- They don't degrade as quickly as lithium ion
- They charge fast and stay charged for way longer, they don't die after hours, more like days
- They don't fucking explode

Bam, battery issue fixed
 
Last edited:

omegasc

Member
An easier way to replace a dead battery would be a better option, but I never had to do it. I am fine with internal batteries on controllers.
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
i agree... but like, this isn't threadworthy
personally i think we should leave a solid state battery in every controller to increase battery life and be done with this bullshit.
There are much less worthy threads.... there is nothing else to talk about. Gaming is almost dead or dying. or at least super dry season.. for past 2 years.
 

coffinbirth

Member
If in 10 years you don't need to open your controller to do some repairs, you ain't even using it. By then you should be comfortable changing the rechargeable battery if it gives up. Way better than spending hundreds of dollars buying AA batteries over 10 years.
Hyperbole.
A set of eneloops will last just as long, if not longer than a battery pack and doesn't cost "hundreds of dollars" They are $20.
I still have a set from the 360 days going strong.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JHKSL28/?tag=neogaf0e-20
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
I've been looking to do that recently. Would love to be entirely off the grid. I'd buy a Tesla in a heartbeat. Imagine never buying gas again. That's the dream....
The most expensive part of getting totally off the grid is storing the energy

Several people I know down here in Florida only have panels to power their home through the day and do not store it and rely on the grid once the sun goes down
 
It is true there are no cons to using batteries, however there are some pros you won't get by using them. Ps4 Pro.

The most important benefit is that it removes attachment to a device like a hoarder. Many people keep outdated things around for years or even decades because they think they are better, or they have nostalgia and don't want to let go. But once your controller permanently dies, then you won't have any way to play your console and you will HAVE to upgrade to the best and latest.

Xbox is the only thing keeping batteries alive, batteries would have went the way of the Commodore if it wasn't for Microsofts greedy strategy with the battery manufacturers, Microsoft forces people to use AA batteries in their controllers, and Duracell and Energizer will lie and say you need batteries for portable electronics, toys, and flashlights when you don't. You can easily replace those with circuit boards or Lithion.

The battery industry is foul, every year, 10 Ecco the Dolphins die due to the waste of battery acid in our Atlantic oceans. Several children in Asia drink that water every year, Microsoft has been responsible for millions of deaths. it's all in the report from the company that compiled the data, and it would be wise to follow their advice.
 
Who is forcing you to replace the entire controller though?

Do you move house every time something in your home needs replacing?
Have you seen how difficult modern controllers are to take apart? When your batteries have a significantly shorter life span controllers with battery compartments have a much easier time getting fresh batteries than ones where the batteries are built in. This is a fact. I shouldn't have to take a controller apart to replace the batteries.
 
Hyperbole.
A set of eneloops will last just as long, if not longer than a battery pack and doesn't cost "hundreds of dollars" They are $20.
I still have a set from the 360 days going strong.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JHKSL28/?tag=neogaf0e-20
So you are assuming an investment into rechargeable batteries to make up for the rechargeable battery that didn't come with the controller? Terrible deal.
 
Last edited:

Topher

Gold Member
The most expensive part of getting totally off the grid is storing the energy

Several people I know down here in Florida only have panels to power their home through the day and do not store it and rely on the grid once the sun goes down

Definitely want a powerwall if I'm going to go to all the trouble.
 

64bitmodels

Reverse groomer.
The mobile phone I'm replying to this thread with is anti-consumer.

Outrageous.

Over the balcony it goes.
yes. Phones used to have swappable batteries. The rush to make everything as impossibly thin as possible has removed them entirely. It's dumb but that's just how it is
i can go on for hours and hours about the shittons of features phones have removed either thanks to the chase of becoming thinner, or Apple's shitty decisions reverbating across the entire smartphone industry. Don't set me off
 
Last edited:

ReBurn

Gold Member
This is a good point and I agree.
Thumb sticks could be easier to replace. Just pull up instead of taking the controller apart
I've replaced batteries in my PS3 controllers and it was no big deal. It seems harder to recycle dead ones than acquire and install new ones. I thought replacing thumbsticks on a DS4 would be easy after watching a few TronicsFix videos. I ended up having to buy a new controller.

I very much prefer controllers that I can put rechargeable batteries into. I think it's the most consumer friendly approach. It is awesome for wireless mice and keyboards and I think it should be an option for all wireless controllers.
 
Last edited:

El Muerto

Member
What's cool with the Xbox is if my controller dies while gaming, i can just slap new batteries in. With PlayStation I would have to have a 2nd controller charged when the first one runs out power, or use a long usb cable. Then long term, internal batteries will explode at some point causing a fire, meanwhile AAs just leak if you are using cheap batteries.
 
An hour of my time taking apart a controller is worth far more than $20, but we all have our own self worth, eh?
If you add up all the time you waste charging your AA batteries it will amount to more than the few minutes it would take for a minimally skilled person to change the internal battery on the DS.

The reality is people don't like AA batteries and they don't want to deal with them, it's 2022 not 1992.

You also think that headsets not having AA batteries is anti-consumer? Wake up.
 
Last edited:

GHG

Member
Have you seen how difficult modern controllers are to take apart? When your batteries have a significantly shorter life span controllers with battery compartments have a much easier time getting fresh batteries than ones where the batteries are built in. This is a fact. I shouldn't have to take a controller apart to replace the batteries.

They really aren't unless you're incapable of following a step by step tutorial on YouTube. But then this isn't surprising coming from someone who stated the PS5 SSD solution was going to be too complicated for consumers despite it only requiring a screwdriver and a couple of minutes.

I'll take only having to take a controller apart once every ~5-7 years after the battery degrades (if I'm even still using the same controller after that amount of time, unlikely) rather than have to faff about with AA batteries and compartments every other day.

It's 2022, get with the programme.

yes. Phones used to have swappable batteries. The rush to make everything as impossibly thin as possible has removed them entirely. It's dumb but that's just how it is
i can go on for hours and hours about the shittons of features phones have removed either thanks to the chase of becoming thinner, or Apple's shitty decisions reverbating across the entire smartphone industry. Don't set me off

Apple weren't the ones at fault here. There are also a plethora of other reasons why modern phones aren't designed with user replaceable batteries in mind but if you want to go back to brick status phones with no IP rating, wireless or fast charging then there are still options available for you even today.
 
Last edited:

coffinbirth

Member
If you add up all the time you waste charging your AA batteries it will amount to more than the few minutes it would take for a minimally skilled person to change the internal battery on the DS.

The reality is people don't like AA batteries and they don't want to deal with them, it's 2022 not 1992.
and-there-you-463h83.jpg
 

oldergamer

Member
After the announcement of Dualsense Pro Edge controller I must come back to his tragic topic.
Many of you have been fooled. Made to think that internal batteries are somehow "comfortable".
This will be yet another 200$ controller with internal battery and no official way to replace it and not other options to power it.
Sony is not selling official replacements for internal batteries and you are stuck with what you get or aftermarket crap.

Internal batteries usage type:
-Use the controller until it depletes
-Connect and play
-Or stop playing, connect and wait with charger
-Controller dies few % each year. A bit with every recharge cycle.
-10-20 years, you get what's happening to ps3 controllers now. Very short or dead battery life. Looking for aftermarket replacements. No official replacements available.

BATTER DOOR ON A CONTROLLER:
-Use AA/AAA
-Use AA/AAA rechargeables
-Possible higher capacity
-Possible different brands
-Can have 2 pairs and swap in an instant - never have to connect to a console or charger to charge and wait.
-Possibility to use Play'n'charge kit that takes place of battery door and just charges with usb c cable normally. Can replace these. Sony could make em just like m$.
-Possibility (in concept, maybe some controller does this) to just charge batteries inside a controller. So just using it exactly like internal but with a batter door do be able to swap dying batteries after years.

There are absolutely no drawbacks to having a batter door on a controller for AA/AAA batteries/rechargeables / play and charge kits.
Your controller will never die.
You will never have to wait for it to charge potentially.
In 20 years, you will just put in new batteries and go.

BUILT-IN Batteries are anti consumer. Create waste products.
Lithiuum Ion batteries are dying and will die. Your every device with internal battery WILL DIE. It's a sad state we accepted this with phones so fight-free.
Even if Sony offered new internal batteries replacements... that would be awesome but they will not do that in years and years after ps4/5 and AAA/AA is a standard tech.

Realistically, I know this probably not a real concern as some after market internals will always be available... But it's not idea... is it ?
fully agree, but there are some here that will argue for internal batteries. Personally I prefer the flexibility the battery door offers.
 
It doesn’t bother me as I don’t play for more than 2-3 hours at a time. I’ve got kids, a job and other hobbies. Internal has always been best for me.
 

sendit

Member
Overall, I am in agreement with this thread. Internal batteries are anti-consumer, anti-friendly, anti-environment, and anti-choice. I've made a list of consumer devices to avoid to help everyone cope with these findings and hopefully drive change as we move forward towards the double A/triple A revolution.
  • Cell phones
  • Laptops
  • Electric Vehicles
  • DualSense/DualShock
  • Xbox Elite Pro Gamepad
  • Nintendo Switch/Lite/Pro
  • Tablets
  • Smartwatches
    • Learn to count your steps manually. It takes practice, but is achievable. If you can dream it, you can do it.
  • Airpods (or wireless earphones of choice)
As a consumer, please add and share this list with other consumers.
 
Paywall for online, horse armor, paywall for apps, charging for F2P... no, we draw the line at the lack of AA batteries. :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 
Last edited:

Miles708

Member
My Nintendo DS is completely screwed because the battery keeps charge for like 20 minutes.

I love internal batteries.

I would love more to be able to change them easily.
 

Zug

Member
Any device with non remplaceable lithium ion batteries should be banned.
Planned obsolescence and obviously non ecological.
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
You have a 10 year old DS3 that holds a charge longer than an hour? Impressive.
I bought a second PS3 when the super slim was end of life. The Dualshock 3 that came with it is basically still in as new condition and whenever I charge it it lasts for weeks.
 

Drew1440

Member
It sucks when the battery starts to swell up, but being honest the device itself will become obsolete before the battery will no longer hold a charge.
The one in my Dell Inspiron laptop is internal, but it's easy enough to replace but you lose the ability to hot swap. I guess that's more of an enterprise feature for their Latitude laptops.
 
Last edited:

Belthazar

Member
My DS4 is almost 10 years old and still works fairly well, so I don't mind. Would hate to have to keep switching batteries on the controller or, worse yet, have to buy a battery pack like on Xbox.
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
This is as relevant as people arguing about physical copies of games.
Physical copies is important but similar topic. Digital only on console is taking away choice, pricing, ownership… everything really.
I will buy physical games as long as the disc version is playable. Just for principle and because there were many examples where digital versions had stuff like music removed or delisted etc
 
Top Bottom