Knitted Knight
Banned
Microsoft are lying because trust me dude. Ok.
Someone made a claim about RGT and I simply said he got it from Kitty. Is Kitty credible? Yes, but that doesn't mean everything she says is automatically correct or isn't subject to change. Xbox is confirmed full RDNA2, for example.
I haven't said they're "lying". I just don't take them at face value. I've said they have a history of BS, which is true. You're using Microsoft's marketing slogans to reach certain conclusions and make wild claims regarding the PS5's SOC which is what I'm saying is completely unproven. Your claims and your opinions using that info are simply FUD and BS. Same rationale applies for the Kitty example. What Microsoft marketing department says does not invalidate or disproves her leak on the Xbox Series X front end architecture being part of RDNA 1 architecture (could be true or false but it hasn't been unproven). Not to mention you got caught flip flopping on Kitty's credibility argument with a poor discrediting attempt against RGT.
Here is also an exercise for you so you may perhaps break from your apparent bind to MS marketing dept (although we know its completely voluntary but just entertain the idea) and stop insulting yourself.
Is Infinite Cache not a feature that's part of RDNA 2? Is the Xbox Series X missing Infinite Cache? Yes or No? If No, where is it? If Yes, isn't it custom then?
Custom or Full? Easy exercise for your brain.
We know what AMD says. Custom RDNA 2 based solutions with their own special sauce.
Last edited: