Its a game of vistas, and great for that.....up close nobody would use this in gaming. Look at where the Queen lives at buckingham palace for example....
These FS2020 videos are awesome. They help me fall asleep every time without fail.
Its a game of vistas, and great for that.....up close nobody would use this in gaming. Look at where the Queen lives at buckingham palace for example....
Gamernyc78
redeemed ... but it makes no difference anymore. 
It has its charm. And many people love the idea of flying.
yes I think it is very beautiful, but it is not my cup of tea. If I had gamepass I would surely try it out but I would never spend a penny on it
I heard this game is coming to consoles. I find it hilarious.
And that's how smart shift works on laptops. You actually think ps5 is the same, why ? What leads you to beleive that ?
Is it because the name is the same
where is the CUSTOM ps5 implementation which is different. OH, its in road to ps5 and explained by Cerny. This is a console APU and has custom.
Laptop is trying to save battery..... its a not a laptop FFS.
The mental gymnasticsIt's the best looking game so far, Period. No need for mental gymnastics.
It's a A Generational Leap In Graphical Realism according to DF. how can you still deny that? By zooming in 100000%?
Also, its not only about graphics, it's also everything around it, it's a snapshot of our ENTIRE WORLD (!!!) and includes REAL-TIME airtime traffic, so basically live planes in real life being in the game with the accurate radar data in real-time!
This is amazing and means that if one of my loved ones or best friends take a plane somewhere I can fly alongside them the entire route and see the weather they are experiencing in real-time with them. The fact the game has ADS-B data integration is amazing. I love the fact I can just fly over to any airport and see the real-time air traffic. As a prior-service US Airman, who worked exclusively with radar systems I think this alone will sell me on the game as everything else is just a gorgeous cherry on top.
And there are also amazing weather effects.
Again the same nonsense. Is it so difficult to understand that variable frequencies are not made for turbo boosts or other shit, but for efficiency and improving the overall performance of the system as a whole? Variable frequencies are necessary to ensure that the system doesn't run idle when there is no load on any of the components (CPU/GPU) and at the same time remains as flexible and efficient as possible when the load appears. In games, the machine always works in dynamics, so what is the need to fix clock speeds, if this doesn't give any advantages?
Even better, you can fly a plane (but not in browser)Hey everyone, just found out I have a next gen PC browser.
It's the exact same shit, same principal mechanism, same task, Cerny even described it on his presentation as you say, it's just the fanboys who are scared as fuck to admin the PS5 GPU won't be constantly running at 2.2GHz (which is officially listed by Sony as "variable" anyway), because that would make the gap to XBX bigger, but it is what it is, bending/denying reality on the internet doesn't work on the actual reality itself. NV has the same sort of tech, called Max-Q Dynamic Boost, and one of their slides is the best illustration how it works:
80W GPU + 35W CPU = 115W total, but that power can be switched to 95W GPU + 20W GPU, so the same 115W total, but more powerful GPU if needed. But PS5 (and any laptop with AMD Smartshift) can also go the other way around as well, like 65W GPU + 50W CPU (for the sake of this graph), whenever the task if CPU-bound. So you can squeeze more CPU and GPU power out of the same 115W depending on the task then if the CPU and GPU were running at fixed clocks, the "Balanced Power" on the graph. it is as you say, a laptop technology, which is indeed used in laptops to save battery by providing more performance at the same power draw, and without needing beefier cooling as well, and that's also why PS5 uses it, to control the temps by operating at a fixed power draw, but providing more CPU/GPU performance than if the clocks were fixed.
?
I think the "sustained performance" paradigm has outlived its usefulness for the simple reason that it didn't match reality and didn't produce the same stable performance. If we take into account the fact that hardware is becoming more complicated technically, as well as faster and hotter, then we need to look more progressively at how to achieve greater efficiency and not sacrifice perfomance. So, Cerny did everything right. And it's very strange that XsX doesn't use such feature. Because the power limit for XsX is exactly the same limiting factor.
Game size delta between PS4 and PS5 would be huge, makes more sense for them to degrade quality and do them realtime.
I think it wouldn't work well with virtualisation which Xbox heavily relies on. It's something very few people talk about but virtualisation always has performance penalties. We've heard that XSX-based server blade will be able to run 4 virtual instances of X1S. Why just 4 if that console is just 1.4 TF? Because of virtualisation and other limitations of hardware besides its TF count.
'So, here we see the place where the SSD is, but I'm too tired to talk about the details now, so let's just say it won't do much difference.'That would be something of an utter disgrace lol.
Lacks VXA.
And I don't know why you are bringing XB and/or Halo into the discussion, goalpost shifting much? I guess you are exactly the type of people I mentioned in one of my previous the previews post. Actually pretty sure about it given you post history and reputation on the forum.
Of course it's not, it's a home console, and it can be 200W, 250W, 280W, 300W, whatever, but you act like you can't compare how a 200HP V6 works with a 350HP V8, because they are oh so totally different, if you have such serious issues with abstract imagination/simple logic/common sense then I guess there's no point in any further discussion with you
Funnily enough the only one I can remember taking a real shot at the game for this was Angry Joe (I often disagree with him, but this is the kind of thing why I watch his reviews).
My bet is this is why the game did not GOTY in the game awards.
Tbf on paper that xb show should of been good:
